These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23917975)

  • 21. Comparison of four pressure ulcer risk assessment tools in critically ill patients.
    Theeranut A; Ninbanphot S; Limpawattana P
    Nurs Crit Care; 2021 Jan; 26(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 32368844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale.
    Curley MA; Razmus IS; Roberts KE; Wypij D
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12552172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
    Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale, Norton Scale, and Waterlow Scale in the Czech Republic.
    Šateková L; Žiaková K; Zeleníková R
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 27874258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing the Validity and Reliability of a New Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale for Patients in Intensive Care Units.
    Efteli E; Güneş Ü
    Wound Manag Prev; 2020 Feb; 66(2):24-33. PubMed ID: 32294059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prediction Pressure Ulcers in High Care Unit Patients: Evaluating Risk Factors and Predictive Scale Using a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.
    Indraswari ADW; Aisyiyah U; Kurniawan K; Surboyo MDC
    Avicenna J Med; 2024 Jan; 14(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 38694142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the predictive validity of the Braden and Waterlow scales in intensive care unit patients: A multicentre study.
    Tao H; Zhang H; Ma Y; Lv L; Pei J; Jiao Y; Han L
    J Clin Nurs; 2024 May; 33(5):1809-1819. PubMed ID: 38031387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predictive validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the risk assessment pressure sore scale in intensive care patients: results of a prospective study.
    Günes ÜY; Efteli E
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Apr; 61(4):58-62. PubMed ID: 25853378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
    Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis.
    He W; Liu P; Chen HL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2012 Feb; 58(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 22316631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predictive capacity of risk assessment scales and clinical judgment for pressure ulcers: a meta-analysis.
    García-Fernández FP; Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL; Agreda JJ
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 24280770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The revised Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Area Risk Calculator.
    Jackson C
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 1999 Jun; 15(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 10595057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Braden scale (ALB) for assessing pressure ulcer risk in hospital patients: A validity and reliability study.
    Chen HL; Cao YJ; Zhang W; Wang J; Huai BS
    Appl Nurs Res; 2017 Feb; 33():169-174. PubMed ID: 28096013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predictive efficacy of the Braden Q Scale for pediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment in the PICU: a meta-analysis.
    Chun X; Lin Y; Ma J; He J; Ye L; Yang H
    Pediatr Res; 2019 Oct; 86(4):436-443. PubMed ID: 31216569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Braden Scale and Norton Scale modified by INSALUD in an acute care hospital: validity and cutoff point.
    González-Ruiz JM; Sebastián-Viana T; Losa-Iglesias ME; Lema-Lorenzo I; Crespo FJ; Martín-Merino G; García-Martín MR; Velayos-Rodríguez E; Nogueiras-Quintas CG
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Nov; 27(11):506-11. PubMed ID: 25325227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Use of the Braden Scale in Assessing Pressure Ulcers in Turkey: A Systematic Review.
    Baris N; Karabacak BG; Alpar ŞE
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2015 Aug; 28(8):349-57. PubMed ID: 26181859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk in critical care patients.
    Serpa LF; Santos VL; Campanili TC; Queiroz M
    Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2011; 19(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 21412629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pressure ulcer risk assessment immediately after cardiac surgery--does it make a difference? A comparison of three pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments within a cardiac surgery population.
    Feuchtinger J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Nurs Crit Care; 2007; 12(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 17883663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predictive validity of 4 risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcer development in a hospital setting.
    Källman U; Lindgren M
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Feb; 27(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 24440864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the Predictive Validity of Norton and Braden Scales in Determining the Risk of Pressure Injury in Elderly Patients.
    Kiyat I; Ozbas A
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2024 May-Jun 01; 38(3):141-146. PubMed ID: 38625804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.