These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23918518)

  • 21. [Labor induction with prostaglandin in post-cesarean section status].
    Schneider KT; Lüftner D; Rath W; Thurmayr GR
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1994; 116(8):461-7. PubMed ID: 7941815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of the effectiveness of prostaglandin E2 gel in evening and morning induction of labor].
    Kupietz R; Faber J; Heidegger H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1994; 116(8):468-73. PubMed ID: 7941816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Prostaglandin E2--an effective alternative for the induction of labor].
    Bozhinova S; Porozhanova V; Popovski K; Bozhinov P; Atanasova S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1995; 34(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 8743832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of spontaneous labor with induced vaginal tablets prostaglandin E2 in grand multiparae.
    Sobande AA; Al-Bar HM; Archibong EI
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Aug; 22(8):698-701. PubMed ID: 11573116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Uterine reactions to prostaglandins in induced labor--results of a multicenter study].
    Mink D; Heiss C; Rath W; Schmidt W
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 7879461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Safety of low-dose prostaglandin E2 induction in grandmultiparous women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Haas J; Barzilay E; Chayen B; Lebovitz O; Yinon Y; Mazaki-Tovi S; Harel L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Mar; 27(5):445-8. PubMed ID: 23841832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.
    Shetty A; Livingstone I; Acharya S; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A
    BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour.
    Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of surface acquired uterine electromyography and intrauterine pressure catheter to assess uterine activity.
    Haran G; Elbaz M; Fejgin MD; Biron-Shental T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):412.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22284960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
    Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of two methods.
    Krammer J; Williams MC; Sawai SK; O'Brien WF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 7898843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Safety of labor induction with prostaglandin E2 in grandmultiparous women.
    Haas J; Barzilay E; Chayen B; Lebovitz O; Yinon Y; Hendler I; Harel L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jan; 26(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 22928497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Induction of labor: a comparative study of intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone.
    Ayaz A; Shaukat S; Farooq MU; Mehmood K; Ahmad I; Ali Bahoo ML
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 49(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 20708519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following additional doses of vaginal prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour: a retrospective cohort study.
    Ayaz H; Black M; Madhuvrata P; Shetty A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct; 170(2):364-7. PubMed ID: 23932182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of prostaglandin E2 tablets or Foley catheter for labour induction in grand multiparas.
    Al-Taani MI
    East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):547-53. PubMed ID: 16335645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Labor induction with 3 mg of prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablets. A renaissance of programmed labor? Results of a prospective randomized study].
    Husslein P; Egarter C; Sevelda P; Genger H; Salzer H; Kofler E
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 Feb; 46(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 3514366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [PgE2 gel and PgE2 vaginal tablets for induced labor--a prospective randomized study].
    Mink D; Boos R; Heiss C; Schmidt W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Jul; 54(7):409-13. PubMed ID: 7926574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Clinical study on dinoprostone suppositories 0.8 mm used in cervical ripening and labor induction of women with term pregnancy of premature rupture of the membranes: a multicenter study].
    Zou LY; Fan L; Duan T; Wang ZL; Ma RM
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 45(7):492-6. PubMed ID: 21029599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.