These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23918854)

  • 21. Hazard Ratio Estimators after Terminating Observation within Matched Pairs in Sibling and Propensity Score Matched Designs.
    Shinozaki T; Mansournia MA
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Jan; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 30648668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A review of covariate selection for non-experimental comparative effectiveness research.
    Sauer BC; Brookhart MA; Roy J; VanderWeele T
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Nov; 22(11):1139-45. PubMed ID: 24006330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Matching on provider is risky.
    Walker AM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S65-8. PubMed ID: 23849156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Causal Diagram Techniques for Urologic Oncology Research.
    Shapiro DD; Msaouel P
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Jun; 19(3):271.e1-271.e7. PubMed ID: 32893127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The control outcome calibration approach for causal inference with unobserved confounding.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 179(5):633-40. PubMed ID: 24363326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using Causal Diagrams to Improve the Design and Interpretation of Medical Research.
    Etminan M; Collins GS; Mansournia MA
    Chest; 2020 Jul; 158(1S):S21-S28. PubMed ID: 32658648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the use and misuse of scalar scores of confounders in design and analysis of observational studies.
    Pfeiffer RM; Riedl R
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(18):2618-35. PubMed ID: 25781579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Negative control exposure studies in the presence of measurement error: implications for attempted effect estimate calibration.
    Sanderson E; Macdonald-Wallis C; Davey Smith G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 47(2):587-596. PubMed ID: 29088358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Matching, an appealing method to avoid confounding?
    de Graaf MA; Jager KJ; Zoccali C; Dekker FW
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2011; 118(4):c315-8. PubMed ID: 21293153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Use of causal diagrams in Epidemiology: application to a situation with confounding].
    Cortes TR; Faerstein E; Struchiner CJ
    Cad Saude Publica; 2016 Aug; 32(8):e00103115. PubMed ID: 27509550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can statistical adjustment guided by causal inference improve the accuracy of effect estimation? A simulation and empirical research based on meta-analyses of case-control studies.
    Yan R; Liu T; Peng Y; Peng X
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Dec; 20(1):333. PubMed ID: 33308213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.
    Schisterman EF; Cole SR; Platt RW
    Epidemiology; 2009 Jul; 20(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 19525685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.
    Yu Y; Li H; Sun X; Su P; Wang T; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Liu Y; Xue F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):177. PubMed ID: 29281984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 15(3):436-40. PubMed ID: 19366394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exchangeability in the case-crossover design.
    Mittleman MA; Mostofsky E
    Int J Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 43(5):1645-55. PubMed ID: 24756878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accounting for Confounding in Observational Studies.
    D'Onofrio BM; Sjölander A; Lahey BB; Lichtenstein P; Öberg AS
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2020 May; 16():25-48. PubMed ID: 32384000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Double-robust estimation of an exposure-outcome odds ratio adjusting for confounding in cohort and case-control studies.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Rotnitzky A
    Stat Med; 2011 Feb; 30(4):335-47. PubMed ID: 21225896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Causal directed acyclic graphs and the direction of unmeasured confounding bias.
    VanderWeele TJ; Hernán MA; Robins JM
    Epidemiology; 2008 Sep; 19(5):720-8. PubMed ID: 18633331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Model Averaging for Improving Inference from Causal Diagrams.
    Hamra GB; Kaufman JS; Vahratian A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Aug; 12(8):9391-407. PubMed ID: 26270672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.