These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23919152)
1. Evidence for no sexual isolation between Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta. Kim YK; Phillips DR; Tao Y Ecol Evol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):2061-74. PubMed ID: 23919152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incipient sexual isolation in the nasuta-albomicans complex of Drosophila: mating preference in male-, female- and multiple-choice mating experiments. Tanuja MT; Ramachandra NB; Ranganath HA J Biosci; 2001 Sep; 26(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 11568482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ON THE ORIGIN OF INCIPIENT REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION: THE CASE OF DROSOPHILA ALBOMICANS AND D. NASUTA. Chang HY; Ayala FJ Evolution; 1989 Dec; 43(8):1610-1624. PubMed ID: 28564329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IX. Host plant and population specific epicuticular hydrocarbon expression influences mate choice and sexual selection. Havens JA; Etges WJ J Evol Biol; 2013 Mar; 26(3):562-76. PubMed ID: 23286346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual isolation between North American and Bogota strains of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Kim YK; Ruiz-GarcĂa M; Alvarez D; Phillips DR; Anderson WW Behav Genet; 2012 May; 42(3):472-82. PubMed ID: 22065259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pattern of sexual isolation between parental races (Drosophila nasuta nasuta and D.n. albomicans) and the newly evolved races (Cytorace I and II). Ramachandra NB; Ranganath HA Indian J Exp Biol; 1994 Feb; 32(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 8045622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Divergent selection on behavioural and chemical traits between reproductively isolated populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Jin B; Barbash DA; Castillo DM J Evol Biol; 2022 May; 35(5):693-707. PubMed ID: 35411988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis. Arthur NJ; Dyer KA BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25881167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A shift to shorter cuticular hydrocarbons accompanies sexual isolation among Davis JS; Pearcy MJ; Yew JY; Moyle LC Evol Lett; 2021 Oct; 5(5):521-540. PubMed ID: 34621538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The speciation history of the Drosophila nasuta complex. Bachtrog D Genet Res; 2006 Aug; 88(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 17014741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The search for causal traits of speciation: Divergent female mate preferences target male courtship song, not pheromones, in Drosophila athabasca species complex. Yukilevich R; Harvey T; Nguyen S; Kehlbeck J; Park A Evolution; 2016 Mar; 70(3):526-42. PubMed ID: 26831347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incipient sexual isolation in the nasuta-albomicans complex of Drosophila: no-choice experiments. Tanuja MT; Ramachandra NB; Ranganath HA J Biosci; 2001 Mar; 26(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11255515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Barriers to gene exchange in hybridizing field crickets: the role of male courtship effort and cuticular hydrocarbons. Maroja LS; McKenzie ZM; Hart E; Jing J; Larson EL; Richardson DP BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 14(1):65. PubMed ID: 24678642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila montana: geographic variation, sexual dimorphism and potential roles as pheromones. Jennings JH; Etges WJ; Schmitt T; Hoikkala A J Insect Physiol; 2014 Feb; 61():16-24. PubMed ID: 24373710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patterns of reproductive isolation in the Humphreys DP; Rundle HD; Dyer KA Curr Zool; 2016 Apr; 62(2):183-191. PubMed ID: 29491905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Specialized cells tag sexual and species identity in Drosophila melanogaster. Billeter JC; Atallah J; Krupp JJ; Millar JG; Levine JD Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):987-91. PubMed ID: 19829381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of female cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profile on male courtship behavior in two hybridizing field crickets Gryllus firmus and Gryllus pennsylvanicus. Heggeseth B; Sim D; Partida L; Maroja LS BMC Evol Biol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):21. PubMed ID: 32019492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid evolution of a few members of nasuta-albomicans complex of Drosophila: study on two candidate genes, Sod1 and Rpd3. Ranjini MS; Ramachandra NB J Mol Evol; 2013 May; 76(5):311-23. PubMed ID: 23619741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No evidence for learned mating discrimination in male Drosophila pseudoobscura. Kandul NP; Wright KM; Kandul EV; Noor MA BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 6():54. PubMed ID: 16824212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]