These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23919165)

  • 1. Estimating resource selection with count data.
    Nielson RM; Sawyer H
    Ecol Evol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):2233-40. PubMed ID: 23919165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating encounter-habitat relationships with scale-integrated resource selection functions.
    Egan ME; Gorman NT; Crews S; Eichholz MW; Skinner D; Schlichting PE; Rayl ND; Bergman EJ; Ellington EH; Bastille-Rousseau G
    J Anim Ecol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38940070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: Efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation.
    Muff S; Signer J; Fieberg J
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jan; 89(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 31454066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the individuality of animal-habitat relationships.
    Montgomery RA; Redilla KM; Ortiz-Calo W; Smith T; Keller B; Millspaugh JJ
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Nov; 8(22):10893-10901. PubMed ID: 30519415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating habitat selection when GPS fix success is less than 100%.
    Nielson RM; Manly BF; McDonald LL; Sawyer H; McDonald TL
    Ecology; 2009 Oct; 90(10):2956-62. PubMed ID: 19886504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The point process use-availability or presence-only likelihood and comments on analysis.
    McDonald TL
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1174-82. PubMed ID: 24111555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis.
    Forester JD; Im HK; Rathouz PJ
    Ecology; 2009 Dec; 90(12):3554-65. PubMed ID: 20120822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A machine-learning approach for extending classical wildlife resource selection analyses.
    Shoemaker KT; Heffelfinger LJ; Jackson NJ; Blum ME; Wasley T; Stewart KM
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Mar; 8(6):3556-3569. PubMed ID: 29607046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anthropogenic resource subsidies determine space use by Australian arid zone dingoes: an improved resource selection modelling approach.
    Newsome TM; Ballard GA; Dickman CR; Fleming PJ; Howden C
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63931. PubMed ID: 23750191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transdisciplinary habitat models for elk and cattle as a proxy for bovine tuberculosis transmission risk.
    Brook RK; McLachlan SM
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Oct; 91(2-4):197-208. PubMed ID: 19541377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions.
    McLoughlin PD; Morris DW; Fortin D; Vander Wal E; Contasti AL
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 19732211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating animal resource selection from telemetry data using point process models.
    Johnson DS; Hooten MB; Kuhn CE
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1155-64. PubMed ID: 23800202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using vertebrate prey capture locations to identify cover type selection patterns of nocturnally foraging Burrowing Owls.
    Marsh A; Bayne EM; Wellicome TI
    Ecol Appl; 2014 Jul; 24(5):950-9. PubMed ID: 25154089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying and correcting spatial bias in opportunistic citizen science data for wild ungulates in Norway.
    Cretois B; Simmonds EG; Linnell JDC; van Moorter B; Rolandsen CM; Solberg EJ; Strand O; Gundersen V; Roer O; Rød JK
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Nov; 11(21):15191-15204. PubMed ID: 34765170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What attracts elk onto cattle pasture? Implications for inter-species disease transmission.
    Pruvot M; Seidel D; Boyce MS; Musiani M; Massolo A; Kutz S; Orsel K
    Prev Vet Med; 2014 Nov; 117(2):326-39. PubMed ID: 25218913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation.
    Thurfjell H; Ciuti S; Boyce MS
    Mov Ecol; 2014; 2(1):4. PubMed ID: 25520815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying suitable late summer brood habitats for willow ptarmigan in Norway.
    Kvasnes MAJ; Pedersen HC; Nilsen EB
    BMC Ecol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):41. PubMed ID: 30285717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Density dependence and climate effects in Rocky Mountain elk: an application of regression with instrumental variables for population time series with sampling error.
    Creel S; Creel M
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Nov; 78(6):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19549144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling spatiotemporal abundance of mobile wildlife in highly variable environments using boosted GAMLSS hurdle models.
    Smith A; Hofner B; Lamb JS; Osenkowski J; Allison T; Sadoti G; McWilliams SR; Paton P
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Mar; 9(5):2346-2364. PubMed ID: 30891185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.