These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23919853)

  • 1. Effect of the Foley catheter and synchronous low dose misoprostol administration on cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial.
    Ugwu EO; Onah HE; Obi SN; Dim CC; Okezie OA; Chigbu CO; Okoro OS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Aug; 33(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 23919853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji AO; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA; Aimakhu CO; Oladokun A; Akindele FO; Adeniji OI; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 16752669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Induction to delivery interval using transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol: A comparative study at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.
    Garba I; Muhammed AS; Muhammad Z; Galadanci HS; Ayyuba R; Abubakar IS
    Ann Afr Med; 2016; 15(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 27549415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
    Fox NS; Saltzman DH; Roman AS; Klauser CK; Moshier E; Rebarber A
    BJOG; 2011 May; 118(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 21332637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
    Ten Eikelder ML; Oude Rengerink K; Jozwiak M; de Leeuw JW; de Graaf IM; van Pampus MG; Holswilder M; Oudijk MA; van Baaren GJ; Pernet PJ; Bax C; van Unnik GA; Martens G; Porath M; van Vliet H; Rijnders RJ; Feitsma AH; Roumen FJ; van Loon AJ; Versendaal H; Weinans MJ; Woiski M; van Beek E; Hermsen B; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    Lancet; 2016 Apr; 387(10028):1619-28. PubMed ID: 26850983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
    Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Owolabi AT; Kuti O; Ogunlola IO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 25(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16234141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone.
    Ande AB; Ezeanochie CM; Olagbuji NB
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):967-71. PubMed ID: 22012248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate for labor induction.
    El-Khayat W; Alelaiw H; El-kateb A; Elsemary A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 25694257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
    Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervico-vaginal foetal fibronectin: a predictor of cervical response at pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Adeniji AO; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA; Oladokun A; Adeniji OI; Egbewale BE; Omigbodun AO
    West Afr J Med; 2005; 24(4):334-7. PubMed ID: 16483052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Rust OA; Greybush M; Atlas RO; Jones KJ; Balducci J
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Sciscione AC; Nguyen L; Manley J; Pollock M; Maas B; Colmorgen G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 97(4):603-7. PubMed ID: 11275035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management.
    Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Gelisen O; Dilbaz B; Ozturk N; Haberal A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15598298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
    Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
    Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
    BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol.
    Bracken H; Mundle S; Faragher B; Easterling T; Haycox A; Turner M; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Sep; 14():308. PubMed ID: 25193157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intravaginal administration of isosorbide mononitrate and misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial.
    Abdellah MS; Hussien M; Aboalhassan A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jul; 284(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 20582425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction.
    Chung JH; Huang WH; Rumney PJ; Garite TJ; Nageotte MP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 189(4):1031-5. PubMed ID: 14586350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.