BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23920336)

  • 1. Predicting commitment in young adults' physically aggressive and sexually coercive dating relationships.
    Young BJ; Furman W
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Nov; 28(17):3245-64. PubMed ID: 23920336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximizing relationship possibilities: relational maximization in romantic relationships.
    Mikkelson AC; Pauley PM
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(4):467-85. PubMed ID: 23951952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Media depictions of physical and relational aggression: connections with aggression in young adults' romantic relationships.
    Coyne SM; Nelson DA; Graham-Kevan N; Tew E; Meng KN; Olsen JA
    Aggress Behav; 2011; 37(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 21046605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Male partners' attachment styles as predictors of women's coerced first sexual intercourse in Chinese college students' dating relationships.
    He S; Tsang S
    Violence Vict; 2014; 29(5):771-83. PubMed ID: 25905127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptions of sexual coercion in heterosexual dating relationships: the role of aggressor gender and tactics.
    Oswald DL; Russel BL
    J Sex Res; 2006 Feb; 43(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 16817071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Male Partners' Investment and Alternatives as Correlates of Women's Coerced First Sexual Intercourse in Chinese Dating Relationships: A Social Exchange Perspective.
    He S; Tsang S
    J Interpers Violence; 2019 Jan; 34(1):182-199. PubMed ID: 29294617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceived conflict patterns and relationship quality associated with verbal sexual coercion by male dating partners.
    Katz J; Myhr L
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Jun; 23(6):798-814. PubMed ID: 18272722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Play context, commitment, and dating violence: a structural equation model.
    Gonzalez-Mendez R; Hernandez-Cabrera JA
    J Interpers Violence; 2009 Sep; 24(9):1518-35. PubMed ID: 18794376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coercive forms of sexual risk and associated violence perpetrated by male partners of female adolescents.
    Silverman JG; McCauley HL; Decker MR; Miller E; Reed E; Raj A
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2011 Mar; 43(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 21388506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Going along with it: sexually coercive partner behavior predicts dating women's compliance with unwanted sex.
    Katz J; Tirone V
    Violence Against Women; 2010 Jul; 16(7):730-42. PubMed ID: 20558767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Romantic Attachment, Conflict Resolution Styles, and Teen Dating Violence Victimization.
    Bonache H; Gonzalez-Mendez R; Krahé B
    J Youth Adolesc; 2017 Sep; 46(9):1905-1917. PubMed ID: 28101748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical and sexual covictimization from dating partners: a distinct type of intimate abuse?
    Katz J; Moore J; May P
    Violence Against Women; 2008 Aug; 14(8):961-80. PubMed ID: 18667408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-determination and sexual experience in dating relationships.
    Brunell AB; Webster GD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jul; 39(7):970-87. PubMed ID: 23613122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Denial, minimization, partner blaming, and intimate aggression in dating partners.
    Scott K; Straus M
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Jul; 22(7):851-71. PubMed ID: 17575066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Need fulfillment in polyamorous relationships.
    Mitchell ME; Bartholomew K; Cobb RJ
    J Sex Res; 2014; 51(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 23541166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship satisfaction and depressive symptoms in emerging adults: cross-sectional associations and moderating effects of relationship characteristics.
    Whitton SW; Kuryluk AD
    J Fam Psychol; 2012 Apr; 26(2):226-35. PubMed ID: 22329388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognition or involvement? Explaining sexual-coercion in high-school dating.
    Enosh G
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Sep; 19(3):311-29. PubMed ID: 17634756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. So far away from one's partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity.
    Dewall CN; Lambert NM; Slotter EB; Pond RS; Deckman T; Finkel EJ; Luchies LB; Fincham FD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Dec; 101(6):1302-16. PubMed ID: 21967006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are all perpetrators alike? Comparing risk factors for sexual coercion and aggression.
    DeGue S; DiLillo D; Scalora M
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):402-26. PubMed ID: 20693517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Communicating interest in sex: verbal and nonverbal initiation of sexual activity in young adults' romantic dating relationships.
    Vannier SA; O'Sullivan LF
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Oct; 40(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 20809374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.