These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23920427)

  • 1. Determining accurate vancomycin MIC values for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by the microdilution method.
    Lepe JA; Domínguez-Herrera J; Pachón J; Aznar J
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2014 Jan; 69(1):136-8. PubMed ID: 23920427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vancomycin MICs do not predict the outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections in correctly treated patients.
    Rojas L; Bunsow E; Muñoz P; Cercenado E; Rodríguez-Créixems M; Bouza E
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2012 Jul; 67(7):1760-8. PubMed ID: 22556382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Method-specific performance of vancomycin MIC susceptibility tests in predicting mortality of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.
    Chen SY; Liao CH; Wang JL; Chiang WC; Lai MS; Chie WC; Chang SC; Hsueh PR
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2014 Jan; 69(1):211-8. PubMed ID: 23997017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relevance of vancomycin-intermediate susceptibility and heteroresistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.
    Khatib R; Jose J; Musta A; Sharma M; Fakih MG; Johnson LB; Riederer K; Shemes S
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2011 Jul; 66(7):1594-9. PubMed ID: 21525024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of method-specific vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration values and their predictability for treatment outcome of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.
    Hsu DI; Hidayat LK; Quist R; Hindler J; Karlsson A; Yusof A; Wong-Beringer A
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2008 Nov; 32(5):378-85. PubMed ID: 18701261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vancomycin susceptibility testing: methodology correlations, temporal trends and clonal patterns.
    van Hal SJ; Barbagiannakos T; Jones M; Wehrhahn MC; Mercer J; Chen D; Paterson DL; Gosbell IB
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2011 Oct; 66(10):2284-7. PubMed ID: 21750101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio as a predictor of vancomycin treatment outcome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.
    Jung Y; Song KH; Cho Je; Kim HS; Kim NH; Kim TS; Choe PG; Chung JY; Park WB; Bang JH; Kim ES; Park KU; Park SW; Kim HB; Kim NJ; Oh MD
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2014 Feb; 43(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 24315788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vancomycin MIC susceptibility testing of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates: a comparison between Etest® and an automated testing method.
    Bland CM; Porr WH; Davis KA; Mansell KB
    South Med J; 2010 Nov; 103(11):1124-8. PubMed ID: 20890258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining vancomycin Etest MICs in patients with MRSA bloodstream infection does not support switching antimicrobials.
    Hos NJ; Jazmati N; Stefanik D; Hellmich M; AlSael H; Kern WV; Rieg S; Wisplinghoff H; Seifert H; Kaasch AJ
    J Infect; 2017 Mar; 74(3):248-259. PubMed ID: 28017826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration results by Etest and broth microdilution methods with population analysis profile: lack of Etest overestimation of the MIC.
    Khatib R; Riederer K; Shemes S; Musta AC; Szpunar S
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2013 Jun; 32(6):803-6. PubMed ID: 23307411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in vancomycin MIC among MRSA isolates by agar dilution and E test method.
    Tandel K; Praharaj AK; Kumar S
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2012; 30(4):453-5. PubMed ID: 23183472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of vancomycin MIC creep on patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.
    Yeh YC; Yeh KM; Lin TY; Chiu SK; Yang YS; Wang YC; Lin JC
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2012 Jun; 45(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 22571999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occurrence of vancomycin-tolerant and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains (hVISA) among Staphylococcus aureus causing bloodstream infections in nine USA hospitals.
    Sader HS; Jones RN; Rossi KL; Rybak MJ
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Nov; 64(5):1024-8. PubMed ID: 19744978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The change and significance of vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from inpatients with lower respiratory tract infection].
    Yang W; He B; Ning YZ; Li Y
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 36(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 23945344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Daptomycin bactericidal activity and correlation between disk and broth microdilution method results in testing of Staphylococcus aureus strains with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin.
    Sader HS; Fritsche TR; Jones RN
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2006 Jul; 50(7):2330-6. PubMed ID: 16801409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of vancomycin exposure on outcomes in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: support for consensus guidelines suggested targets.
    Kullar R; Davis SL; Levine DP; Rybak MJ
    Clin Infect Dis; 2011 Apr; 52(8):975-81. PubMed ID: 21460309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pharmacodynamic activity of ceftobiprole compared with vancomycin versus methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) using an in vitro model.
    Zhanel GG; Voth D; Nichol K; Karlowsky JA; Noreddin AM; Hoban DJ
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Aug; 64(2):364-9. PubMed ID: 19454524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vancomycin MICs did not creep in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 2002 to 2006 in a setting with low vancomycin usage.
    Alós JI; García-Cañas A; García-Hierro P; Rodríguez-Salvanés F
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Oct; 62(4):773-5. PubMed ID: 18552338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of teicoplanin and vancomycin in vitro activity on clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
    Tascini C; Flammini S; Leonildi A; Ciullo I; Tagliaferri E; Menichetti F
    J Chemother; 2012 Aug; 24(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 23040680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vancomycin MIC creep in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from 2006 to 2010 in a hospital in China.
    Chang W; Ma X; Gao P; Lv X; Lu H; Chen F
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2015; 33(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 25865979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.