These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23920578)

  • 1. Comparing approaches to measuring the adoption and usability of electronic health records: lessons learned from Canada, Denmark and Finland.
    Kushniruk A; Kaipio J; Nieminen M; Nøhr C; Borycki E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():367-71. PubMed ID: 23920578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
    Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human Factors in the Large: Experiences from Denmark, Finland and Canada in Moving Towards Regional and National Evaluations of Health Information System Usability. Contribution of the IMIA Human Factors Working Group.
    Kushniruk A; Kaipio J; Nieminen M; Hyppönen H; Lääveri T; Nohr C; Kanstrup AM; Berg Christiansen M; Kuo MH; Borycki E
    Yearb Med Inform; 2014 Aug; 9(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 25123725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of the utilization of an installed electronic health record.
    Dullabh P; Moiduddin A; Babalola E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):81-5. PubMed ID: 20841654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring use of electronic health record functionality using system audit information.
    Bowes WA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):86-90. PubMed ID: 20841655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determinants of clinical information system post-adoption success.
    Palm JM; Grant A; Moutquin JM; Degoulet P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):213-7. PubMed ID: 20841680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electronic health record usage behaviors in primary care medical practices: A survey of family physicians in Canada.
    Paré G; Raymond L; Guinea AO; Poba-Nzaou P; Trudel MC; Marsan J; Micheneau T
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):857-67. PubMed ID: 26238705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A conceptual framework for analyzing how Canadian physicians are using electronic medical records in clinical care.
    Paterson G; Shaw N; Grant A; Leonard K; Delisle E; Mitchell S; McCarrey M; Pascal B; Kraetschmer N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):141-5. PubMed ID: 20841666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Barriers to organizational adoption of EMR systems in family physician practices: a mixed-methods study in Canada.
    Paré G; Raymond L; de Guinea AO; Poba-Nzaou P; Trudel MC; Marsan J; Micheneau T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Aug; 83(8):548-58. PubMed ID: 24969270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adoption of electronic health records and preparations for demonstrating meaningful use: an American Academy of Ophthalmology survey.
    Boland MV; Chiang MF; Lim MC; Wedemeyer L; Epley KD; McCannel CA; Silverstone DE; Lum F;
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1702-10. PubMed ID: 23806425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pediatricians' use of health information technology: a national survey.
    Leu MG; O'Connor KG; Marshall R; Price DT; Klein JD
    Pediatrics; 2012 Dec; 130(6):e1441-6. PubMed ID: 23166335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EHR SCORECARD. Physician ratings on system usability.
    Med Econ; 2014 Oct; 91(19):22-3. PubMed ID: 26242085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying the clinical adoption framework to evaluate the impact of an ambulatory electronic medical record.
    Lau F; Partridge C; Randhawa G; Bowen M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 183():15-20. PubMed ID: 23388247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The avoidable misfortune of a computerized patient chart.
    Sørby ID; Seland G; Nytrø O
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):131-5. PubMed ID: 20841664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health information exchange in Finland: Usage of different access types and predictors of paper use.
    Hyppönen H; Lumme S; Reponen J; Vänskä J; Kaipio J; Heponiemi T; Lääveri T
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Feb; 122():1-6. PubMed ID: 30623778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applying usability methods to identify health literacy issues: an example using a Personal Health Record.
    Monkman H; Kushniruk A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 183():179-85. PubMed ID: 23388278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Creating a survey to assess physicians' adoption of health information technology.
    Baier RR; Gardner RL; Buechner JS; Harris Y; Viner-Brown S; Gifford DS
    Med Care Res Rev; 2012 Apr; 69(2):231-45. PubMed ID: 22156836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them?
    Simon SR; McCarthy ML; Kaushal R; Jenter CA; Volk LA; Poon EG; Yee KC; Orav EJ; Williams DH; Bates DW
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Feb; 14(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18211642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A national study of challenges to electronic health record adoption and meaningful use.
    Heisey-Grove D; Danehy LN; Consolazio M; Lynch K; Mostashari F
    Med Care; 2014 Feb; 52(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 24309669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring Population Health Using Electronic Health Records: Exploring Biases and Representativeness in a Community Health Information Exchange.
    Dixon BE; Gibson PJ; Frederickson Comer K; Rosenman M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():1009. PubMed ID: 26262310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.