These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23920589)

  • 1. Clinical Computer Systems Survey (CLICS): learning about health information technology (HIT) in its context of use.
    Lichtner V; Cornford T; Klecun E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():422-6. PubMed ID: 23920589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitude, Practise and Adoption Among Health Care Professionals for Informatics/Computerised Technology Systems.
    Karthik K; Munuswamy S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():997-8. PubMed ID: 27332450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of health information technology in saudi primary healthcare centers.
    Almaiman A; Bahkali S; Alfrih S; Househ M; El Metwally A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 202():209-12. PubMed ID: 25000053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to measure technology assessment: an introduction.
    Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 202():1-4. PubMed ID: 25000000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards Evidence Based Usability in Health Informatics?
    Marcilly R; Peute LW; Beuscart-Zephir MC; Jaspers MW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 218():55-60. PubMed ID: 26262527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing approaches to measuring the adoption and usability of electronic health records: lessons learned from Canada, Denmark and Finland.
    Kushniruk A; Kaipio J; Nieminen M; Nøhr C; Borycki E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():367-71. PubMed ID: 23920578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. User Expectations: Nurses' Perspective.
    Gürsel G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():897-8. PubMed ID: 27332398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Undirected health IT implementation in ambulatory care favors paper-based workarounds and limits health data exchange.
    Djalali S; Ursprung N; Rosemann T; Senn O; Tandjung R
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Nov; 84(11):920-32. PubMed ID: 26296433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers' viewpoint in Finland.
    Martikainen S; Korpela M; Tiihonen T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 24382475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Designing for privacy management in hospitals: Understanding the gap between user activities and IT staff's understandings.
    Eikey EV; Murphy AR; Reddy MC; Xu H
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Dec; 84(12):1065-75. PubMed ID: 26467571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Thailand universal coverage scheme on the country's health information systems and health information technology.
    Kijsanayotin B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():989. PubMed ID: 23920763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Framework of 'p'-Benefits in Health Information Technology Implementation.
    Kuziemsky CE; Keshavjee K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 208():232-6. PubMed ID: 25676979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Information technology and hospital patient safety: a cross-sectional study of US acute care hospitals.
    Appari A; Johnson EM; Anthony DL
    Am J Manag Care; 2014 Nov; 20(11 Spec No. 17):eSP39-47. PubMed ID: 25811818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between super users' attitudes and employee experiences with clinical information systems.
    Halbesleben JR; Wakefield DS; Ward MM; Brokel J; Crandall D
    Med Care Res Rev; 2009 Feb; 66(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 19047764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of continuance intention in a post-adoption satisfaction evaluation of a clinical information system.
    Hadji B; Dupuis I; Leneveut L; Heudes D; Wagner JF; Degoulet P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():990-4. PubMed ID: 25160336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health Information Technology Evaluation Framework (HITREF) Comprehensiveness as Assessed in Electronic Point-of-Care Documentation Systems Evaluations.
    Sockolow PS; Bowles KH; Rogers M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():406-9. PubMed ID: 26262081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Organizational factors influencing health information technology adoption in long-term-care facilities.
    Wang T; Wang Y; Moczygemba J
    Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2014; 33(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 24463588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
    Bauer NS; Carroll AE; Downs SM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 23788628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. User experiences with different regional health information exchange systems in Finland.
    Hyppönen H; Reponen J; Lääveri T; Kaipio J
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jan; 83(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 24200753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Insights and limits of usability evaluation methods along the health information technology lifecycle.
    Marcilly R; Kushniruk AW; Beuscart-Zephir MC; Borycki EM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():115-9. PubMed ID: 25991113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.