These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23920636)

  • 1. Applying multiple methods to assess the readability of a large corpus of medical documents.
    Wu DT; Hanauer DA; Mei Q; Clark PM; An LC; Lei J; Proulx J; Zeng-Treitler Q; Zheng K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():647-51. PubMed ID: 23920636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the readability of ClinicalTrials.gov.
    Wu DT; Hanauer DA; Mei Q; Clark PM; An LC; Proulx J; Zeng QT; Vydiswaran VG; Collins-Thompson K; Zheng K
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Mar; 23(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 26269536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coverage and Readability of Information Resources to Help Patients Understand Radiology Reports.
    Martin-Carreras T; Kahn CE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Dec; 15(12):1681-1686. PubMed ID: 29310924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving patients' electronic health record comprehension with NoteAid.
    Polepalli Ramesh B; Houston T; Brandt C; Fang H; Yu H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():714-8. PubMed ID: 23920650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing Readability: Are Urogynecologic Patient Education Materials at an Appropriate Reading Level?
    Haller J; Keller Z; Barr S; Hadden K; Oliphant SS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):139-144. PubMed ID: 30807416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the readability of online foot and ankle patient education materials.
    Sheppard ED; Hyde Z; Florence MN; McGwin G; Kirchner JS; Ponce BA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1282-6. PubMed ID: 25239196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using text prediction for facilitating input and improving readability of clinical text.
    Ahltorp M; Skeppstedt M; Dalianis H; Kvist M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1149. PubMed ID: 23920923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An ontology model for nursing narratives with natural language generation technology.
    Min YH; Park HA; Jeon E; Lee JY; Jo SJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():962. PubMed ID: 23920736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.
    Emanuel EJ; Boyle CW
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e2110843. PubMed ID: 33909052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability levels of individualized family service plans.
    Pizur-Barnekow K; Patrick T; Rhyner PM; Folk L; Anderson K
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2010 Aug; 30(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 20608861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care.
    Stossel LM; Segar N; Gliatto P; Fallar R; Karani R
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Sep; 27(9):1165-70. PubMed ID: 22528620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.
    Williams AM; Muir KW; Rosdahl JA
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():133. PubMed ID: 27487960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative readability analysis of websites providing information on traumatic brain injury and epilepsy: A need for clear communication.
    Correa DJ; Milano L; Kwon CS; Jetté N; Dlugos D; Harte-Hargrove L; Pugh MJ; Smith JK; Moshé SL
    Epilepsia; 2020 Mar; 61(3):528-538. PubMed ID: 32096225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of Internet information in pediatric otolaryngology: a comparison of three most referenced websites.
    Volsky PG; Baldassari CM; Mushti S; Derkay CS
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1312-6. PubMed ID: 22770592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A large-scaled corpus for assessing text readability.
    Crossley S; Heintz A; Choi JS; Batchelor J; Karimi M; Malatinszky A
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):491-507. PubMed ID: 35297016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.
    Prabhu AV; Kim C; Crihalmeanu T; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; DeFrances MC; Trejo Bittar HE
    Hum Pathol; 2017 Jul; 65():15-20. PubMed ID: 28504209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health literacy training for health professions students.
    Hadden KB
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Jul; 98(7):918-20. PubMed ID: 25850755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating online health information: beyond readability formulas.
    Leroy G; Helmreich S; Cowie JR; Miller T; Zheng W
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; 2008():394-8. PubMed ID: 18998902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing A syndromic surveillance text classifier for influenza-like illness: Does document source matter?
    South BR; Chapman WW; Delisle S; Shen S; Kalp E; Perl T; Samore MH; Gundlapalli AV
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; 2008():692-6. PubMed ID: 18999051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health information text characteristics.
    Leroy G; Eryilmaz E; Laroya BT
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():479-83. PubMed ID: 17238387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.