These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23920636)
21. Open notes sounds great, but will a provider's documentation change? An exploratory study of the effect of open notes on oncology documentation. Rahimian M; Warner JL; Salmi L; Rosenbloom ST; Davis RB; Joyce RM JAMIA Open; 2021 Jul; 4(3):ooab051. PubMed ID: 34661067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of a French medical multi-terminology indexer for the manual annotation of natural language medical reports of healthcare-associated infections. Sakji S; Gicquel Q; Pereira S; Kergourlay I; Proux D; Darmoni S; Metzger MH Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):252-6. PubMed ID: 20841688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Aligning lay and specialized passages in comparable medical corpora. Deleger L; Zweigenbaum P Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():89-94. PubMed ID: 18487713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Annotating temporal information in clinical narratives. Sun W; Rumshisky A; Uzuner O J Biomed Inform; 2013 Dec; 46 Suppl(0):S5-S12. PubMed ID: 23872518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Integrating personalized health information from MedlinePlus in a patient portal. Borbolla D; Del Fiol G; Taliercio V; Otero C; Campos F; Martinez M; Luna D; Quiros F Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():348-52. PubMed ID: 25160204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development and evaluation of RapTAT: a machine learning system for concept mapping of phrases from medical narratives. Gobbel GT; Reeves R; Jayaramaraja S; Giuse D; Speroff T; Brown SH; Elkin PL; Matheny ME J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():54-65. PubMed ID: 24316051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Preliminary Characterization of Canonicalized and Non-Canonicalized Section Headers Across Variable Clinical Note Types. Wang J; Yu S; Davoudi A; Mowery DL AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2020; 2020():1268-1276. PubMed ID: 33936503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient Perception of Plain-Language Medical Notes Generated Using Artificial Intelligence Software: Pilot Mixed-Methods Study. Bala S; Keniston A; Burden M JMIR Form Res; 2020 Jun; 4(6):e16670. PubMed ID: 32442148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A rule-based method for continuity of care identification in discharge summaries. Silva e Oliveira LE; de Souza AC; Nohama P; Moro CM Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1221. PubMed ID: 23920995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Substring selection for biomedical document classification. Han B; Obradovic Z; Hu ZZ; Wu CH; Vucetic S Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(17):2136-42. PubMed ID: 16837530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Applying language technology to nursing documents: pros and cons with a focus on ethics. Suominen H; Lehtikunnas T; Back B; Karsten H; Salakoski T; Salanterä S Int J Med Inform; 2007 Oct; 76 Suppl 2():S293-301. PubMed ID: 17604685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the Readability of Medical Documents: A Ranking Approach. Zheng J; Yu H JMIR Med Inform; 2018 Mar; 6(1):e17. PubMed ID: 29572199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Readability of Spanish-Language Patient Education Materials From RadiologyInfo.org. Novin SA; Huh EH; Bange MG; Hui FK; Yi PH J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Aug; 16(8):1108-1113. PubMed ID: 30956087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Development of SMOG-Cro readability formula for healthcare communication and patient education. Brangan S Coll Antropol; 2015 Mar; 39(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 26040062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information. Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ontology-based structured cosine similarity in document summarization: with applications to mobile audio-based knowledge management. Yuan ST; Sun J IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2005 Oct; 35(5):1028-40. PubMed ID: 16240776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing readability of consumer health information: an exploratory study. Gemoets D; Rosemblat G; Tse T; Logan R Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):869-73. PubMed ID: 15360936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Readability of out-patient letters copied to patients: can patients understand what is written about them? Todhunter SL; Clamp PJ; Gillett S; Pothier DD J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Mar; 124(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 19954560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]