These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23920653)

  • 21. Multi-method laboratory user evaluation of an actionable clinical performance information system: Implications for usability and patient safety.
    Brown B; Balatsoukas P; Williams R; Sperrin M; Buchan I
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jan; 77():62-80. PubMed ID: 29146562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system.
    Jaspers MW; Peute LW; Lauteslager A; Bakker PJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():303-8. PubMed ID: 18487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Essential questions: accuracy, errors and user perceptions in a drag/drop user-composable electronic health record.
    Senathirajah Y; Kaufman D; Bakken S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 194():181-7. PubMed ID: 23941953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Augmentation of the think aloud method with users' perspectives for the selection of a picture archiving and communication system.
    Zahiri Esfahani M; Khajouei R; Baneshi MR
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Apr; 80():43-51. PubMed ID: 29501909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability.
    Viitanen J; Hyppönen H; Lääveri T; Vänskä J; Reponen J; Winblad I
    Int J Med Inform; 2011 Oct; 80(10):708-25. PubMed ID: 21784701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. CPOE system design aspects and their qualitative effect on usability.
    Khajouei R; Jaspers MW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():309-14. PubMed ID: 18487749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of usability evaluation methods: heuristic evaluation versus end-user think-aloud protocol - an example from a web-based communication tool for nurse scheduling.
    Yen PY; Bakken S
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2009 Nov; 2009():714-8. PubMed ID: 20351946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Building a time-saving and adaptable tool to report adverse drug events.
    Parès Y; Declerck G; Hussain S; Ng R; Jaulent MC
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():903-7. PubMed ID: 23920689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing usability testing outcomes and functions of six electronic nursing record systems.
    Cho I; Kim E; Choi WH; Staggers N
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Apr; 88():78-85. PubMed ID: 26878766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of a human factors approach to uncover informatics needs of nurses in documentation of care.
    Rogers ML; Sockolow PS; Bowles KH; Hand KE; George J
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1068-74. PubMed ID: 24008175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ease of adoption of clinical natural language processing software: An evaluation of five systems.
    Zheng K; Vydiswaran VGV; Liu Y; Wang Y; Stubbs A; Uzuner Ö; Gururaj AE; Bayer S; Aberdeen J; Rumshisky A; Pakhomov S; Liu H; Xu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Dec; 58 Suppl(Suppl):S189-S196. PubMed ID: 26210361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A usability evaluation of medical software at an expert conference setting.
    Bond RR; Finlay DD; Nugent CD; Moore G; Guldenring D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014; 113(1):383-95. PubMed ID: 24210868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implementation of an emergency department computer system: design features that users value.
    Batley NJ; Osman HO; Kazzi AA; Musallam KM
    J Emerg Med; 2011 Dec; 41(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 20619572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a mandatory quality assurance data capture in anesthesia: a secure electronic system to capture quality assurance information linked to an automated anesthesia record.
    Peterfreund RA; Driscoll WD; Walsh JL; Subramanian A; Anupama S; Weaver M; Morris T; Arnholz S; Zheng H; Pierce ET; Spring SF
    Anesth Analg; 2011 May; 112(5):1218-25. PubMed ID: 21415434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Designing and evaluating an electronic patient falls reporting system: perspectives for the implementation of health information technology in long-term residential care facilities.
    Mei YY; Marquard J; Jacelon C; DeFeo AL
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e294-306. PubMed ID: 21482183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The usability-error ontology.
    Elkin PL; Beuscart-Zephir MC; Pelayo S; Patel V; Nøhr C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 194():91-6. PubMed ID: 23941937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. From users involvement to users' needs understanding: a case study.
    Niès J; Pelayo S
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Apr; 79(4):e76-82. PubMed ID: 19660983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relationship between user interface problems of an admission, discharge and transfer module and usability features: a usability testing method.
    Farrahi R; Rangraz Jeddi F; Nabovati E; Sadeqi Jabali M; Khajouei R
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Aug; 19(1):172. PubMed ID: 31445520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence.
    Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 May; 78(5):340-53. PubMed ID: 19046928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improving the User Experience with Discount Site-Specific User Testing.
    Pierce RP; Eskridge BR; Ross B; Day MA; Dean B; Belden JL
    Appl Clin Inform; 2022 Oct; 13(5):1040-1052. PubMed ID: 36323335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.