114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23920844)
1. A maturity model to deliver a national shared medications system, options, practice, and pitfalls.
Bainbridge M; Pearce C; Taggart R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1070. PubMed ID: 23920844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ensuring clinical utility and function in a large scale national project in Australia by embedding clinical informatics into design.
Pearce C; Macdougall C; Bainbridge M; Davidson J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():28-32. PubMed ID: 23920509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Usability and accessibility in consumer health informatics current trends and future challenges.
Goldberg L; Lide B; Lowry S; Massett HA; O'Connell T; Preece J; Quesenbery W; Shneiderman B
Am J Prev Med; 2011 May; 40(5 Suppl 2):S187-97. PubMed ID: 21521594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Australia's personally controlled electronic health record and primary healthcare: generating a framework for implementation and evaluation.
Almond H; Cummings E; Turner P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 188():1-6. PubMed ID: 23823280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Australian general public's perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR).
Andrews L; Gajanayake R; Sahama T
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Dec; 83(12):889-900. PubMed ID: 25200198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A qualitative study of Australians' opinions about personally controlled electronic health records.
Lehnbom EC; McLachlan A; Brien JA
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 178():105-10. PubMed ID: 22797027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Knowledge and attitudes regarding the personally controlled electronic health record: an Australian national survey.
Lehnbom EC; Brien JE; McLachlan AJ
Intern Med J; 2014 Apr; 44(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 24754689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A pilot study on the views of elderly regional Australians of personally controlled electronic health records.
Kerai P; Wood P; Martin M
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 24382474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attitudes of pregnant women towards personally controlled electronic, hospital-held, and patient-held medical record systems: a survey study.
Quinlivan JA; Lyons S; Petersen RW
Telemed J E Health; 2014 Sep; 20(9):810-5. PubMed ID: 25046543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A personally controlled electronic health record for Australia.
Pearce C; Bainbridge M
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(4):707-13. PubMed ID: 24650635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An efficacy driven approach for medication recommendation in type 2 diabetes treatment using data mining techniques.
Liu H; Xie G; Mei J; Shen W; Sun W; Li X
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1071. PubMed ID: 23920845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. eHealth-as-a-Service (eHaaS): a data-driven decision making approach in Australian context.
Black A; Sahama T; Gajanayake R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():915-9. PubMed ID: 25160321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Demographic characteristics of Australian health consumers who were early registrants for opt-in personally controlled electronic health records.
Torrens E; Walker SM
Health Inf Manag; 2017 Sep; 46(3):127-133. PubMed ID: 28537210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient perspectives on a personally controlled electronic health record used in regional Australia.
Hanna L; Gill SD; Newstead L; Hawkins M; Osborne RH
Health Inf Manag; 2017 Jan; 46(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 27486184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Information infrastructure for consumer health: a health information exchange stakeholder study.
Thornewill J; Dowling AF; Cox BA; Esterhay RJ
Am J Prev Med; 2011 May; 40(5 Suppl 2):S123-33. PubMed ID: 21521585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Organising and presenting information.
Kankanady R; Wells M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 193():209-30. PubMed ID: 24018519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of local support for the adoption of a national programme--a descriptive study.
Pearce C; Bartlett J; Mcleod A; Eustace P; Amos R; Shearer M
Inform Prim Care; 2014; 21(4):171-8. PubMed ID: 25479347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the coordination of patients' medication management: a regional Finnish development project.
Kivekäs E; Luukkonen I; Mykkänen J; Saranto K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 201():175-80. PubMed ID: 24943541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Envisioning electronic health record systems as change management: the experience of an English hospital joining the National Programme for Information Technology.
Takian A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():901-5. PubMed ID: 22874323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Realist review to inform development of the electronic advance care plan for the personally controlled electronic health record in Australia.
Skinner I; Smith C; Jaffray L
Telemed J E Health; 2014 Nov; 20(11):1042-8. PubMed ID: 25290057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
