These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23921089)

  • 1. A randomized trial comparing metallic and absorbable staples for closure of a Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean delivery.
    Feese CA; Johnson S; Jones E; Lambers DS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 209(6):556.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23921089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use.
    Nitsche J; Howell C; Howell T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 22037686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
    Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
    Frishman GN; Schwartz T; Hogan JW
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
    Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
    Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
    Cooper SM; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN
    Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Clay FS; Walsh CA; Walsh SR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 21195384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Prospective Randomized Control Study Comparing the Effects of Dermal Staples and Intradermal Sutures on Postoperative Scarring After Thyroidectomy.
    Ku D; Koo DH; Bae DS
    J Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 256():413-421. PubMed ID: 32791393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Closure of skin incision after thyroidectomy through a supraclavicular approach: a comparison between tissue adhesive and staples.
    Yang YL; Xiang YY; Jin LP; Pan YF; Zhou SM; Zhang XH; Qu JM
    Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 24056141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skin closure of pfannenstiel incision with dermabond, staples, or suture during cesarean delivery: experience of a single attending.
    Siddiqui DS; Lacuna EM; Chen HY; Chauhan SP
    Am J Perinatol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 22875661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Placement of Absorbable Dermal Staples in Mammaplasty and Abdominoplasty: A 12-Month Prospective Study of 60 Patients.
    Bron T; Zakine G
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 26530478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Basha SL; Rochon ML; Quiñones JN; Coassolo KM; Rust OA; Smulian JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):285.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20816153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
    Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of absorbable staples for skin closure after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy.
    Watson FC; McMullan W; Jordan CJ; Egan P; Tuan J; Solano MA; Fizpatrick N
    Vet Surg; 2019 Jan; 48(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 30378125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.