162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23921448)
1. Dynamic flux balance analysis of batch fermentation: effect of genetic manipulations on ethanol production.
Lisha KP; Sarkar D
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2014 Apr; 37(4):617-27. PubMed ID: 23921448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In silico analysis of bioethanol overproduction by genetically modified microorganisms in coculture fermentation.
Parambil LK; Sarkar D
Biotechnol Res Int; 2015; 2015():238082. PubMed ID: 25785200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic flux balance modeling of microbial co-cultures for efficient batch fermentation of glucose and xylose mixtures.
Hanly TJ; Henson MA
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Feb; 108(2):376-85. PubMed ID: 20882517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic flux balance modeling of S. cerevisiae and E. coli co-cultures for efficient consumption of glucose/xylose mixtures.
Hanly TJ; Urello M; Henson MA
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Mar; 93(6):2529-41. PubMed ID: 22005741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genome-scale analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism and ethanol production in fed-batch culture.
Hjersted JL; Henson MA; Mahadevan R
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Aug; 97(5):1190-204. PubMed ID: 17243146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Steady-state and dynamic flux balance analysis of ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Hjersted JL; Henson MA
IET Syst Biol; 2009 May; 3(3):167-79. PubMed ID: 19449977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeated-batch fermentations of xylose and glucose-xylose mixtures using a respiration-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae engineered for xylose metabolism.
Kim SR; Lee KS; Choi JH; Ha SJ; Kweon DH; Seo JH; Jin YS
J Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 150(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 20933550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioconversion of lignocellulose-derived sugars to ethanol by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Madhavan A; Srivastava A; Kondo A; Bisaria VS
Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2012 Mar; 32(1):22-48. PubMed ID: 21204601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fermentative and growth performances of Dekkera bruxellensis in different batch systems and the effect of initial low cell counts in co-cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Meneghin MC; Bassi AP; Codato CB; Reis VR; Ceccato-Antonini SR
Yeast; 2013 Aug; 30(8):295-305. PubMed ID: 23658026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel two-stage fermentation process for bioethanol production using Saccharomyces pastorianus.
Gowtham YK; Miller KP; Hodge DB; Henson JM; Harcum SW
Biotechnol Prog; 2014; 30(2):300-10. PubMed ID: 24376155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stress-related challenges in pentose fermentation to ethanol by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Almeida JR; Runquist D; Sànchez i Nogué V; Lidén G; Gorwa-Grauslund MF
Biotechnol J; 2011 Mar; 6(3):286-99. PubMed ID: 21305697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioethanol production from mixed sugars by Scheffersomyces stipitis free and immobilized cells, and co-cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
De Bari I; De Canio P; Cuna D; Liuzzi F; Capece A; Romano P
N Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 30(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 23454083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Probing the bioethanol production potential of Scheffersomyces (Pichia) stipitis using validated genome-scale model.
Parambil LK; Sarkar D
Biotechnol Lett; 2014 Dec; 36(12):2443-51. PubMed ID: 25129048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Progress in the pathway engineering of ethanol fermentation from xylose utilising recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae].
Shen Y; Wang Y; Bao XM; Qu YB
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2003 Sep; 19(5):636-40. PubMed ID: 15969099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved bioethanol production using fusants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and xylose-fermenting yeasts.
Kumari R; Pramanik K
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2012 Jun; 167(4):873-84. PubMed ID: 22639357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethanol production from wheat straw by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Scheffersomyces stipitis co-culture in batch and continuous system.
Karagöz P; Özkan M
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Apr; 158():286-93. PubMed ID: 24614063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fermentation performance of engineered and evolved xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
Sonderegger M; Jeppsson M; Larsson C; Gorwa-Grauslund MF; Boles E; Olsson L; Spencer-Martins I; Hahn-Hägerdal B; Sauer U
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Jul; 87(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 15211492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genome-scale modeling and in silico analysis of ethanologenic bacteria Zymomonas mobilis.
Widiastuti H; Kim JY; Selvarasu S; Karimi IA; Kim H; Seo JS; Lee DY
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2011 Mar; 108(3):655-65. PubMed ID: 20967753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Establishment of L-arabinose fermentation in glucose/xylose co-fermenting recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae 424A(LNH-ST) by genetic engineering.
Bera AK; Sedlak M; Khan A; Ho NW
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Aug; 87(5):1803-11. PubMed ID: 20449743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimized fed-batch fermentation of Scheffersomyces stipitis for efficient production of ethanol from hexoses and pentoses.
Unrean P; Nguyen NH
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2013 Mar; 169(6):1895-909. PubMed ID: 23344940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
