217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23921920)
1. Effects of acoustic stimuli used for vestibular evoked myogenic potential studies on the cochlear function.
Krause E; Mayerhofer A; Gürkov R; Drexl M; Braun T; Olzowy B; Boetzel K
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1186-92. PubMed ID: 23921920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in cochlear function related to acoustic stimulation of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential stimulation.
Strömberg AK; Olofsson Å; Westin M; Duan M; Stenfelt S
Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():43-49. PubMed ID: 26724755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Thresholds, Frequency Tuning, and Effects of Sound Exposure.
Rodriguez AI; Thomas MLA; Janky KL
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 29870520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is There a Safe Level for Recording Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential? Evidence From Cochlear and Hearing Function Tests.
Singh NK; Keloth NK; Sinha S
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 30148803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of High Sound Exposure During Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children and Young Adults.
Rodriguez AI; Thomas MLA; Fitzpatrick D; Janky KL
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 29466264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
Hoth S
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission tests evaluate cochlear function and differentiate cochlear and vestibular schwannoma.
Kagoya R; Shinogami M; Kohno M; Yamasoba T
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Feb; 148(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 23197675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Study of the correspondence between pure tone and distorsion product otoacoustic emissions audiometrics: basis for an objective cochlear audiometrics model].
Jürgens A; Buisan A; Canela M; Abelló P
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 May; 50(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 10431072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extended frequency range hearing thresholds and otoacoustic emissions in acute acoustic trauma.
Büchler M; Kompis M; Hotz MA
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Oct; 33(8):1315-22. PubMed ID: 22931865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safe levels of acoustic stimulation: comment on '"effects of acoustic stimuli used for vestibular evoked myogenic potential studies on the cochlear function '".
Colebatch JG; Rosengren SM
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jun; 35(5):932-3. PubMed ID: 24751736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: a potential diagnostic tool to evaluate the vestibular nerve.
Chang MY; Song JJ; Kim JS; Koo JW
Med Hypotheses; 2013 Nov; 81(5):830-3. PubMed ID: 24074898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing loss in vestibular schwannomas: analysis of cochlear function by means of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Ferri GG; Modugno GC; Calbucci F; Ceroni AR; Pirodda A
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Dec; 36(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 19419826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical use of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in the evaluation of patients with air-bone gaps.
Zhou G; Poe D; Gopen Q
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Oct; 33(8):1368-74. PubMed ID: 22975905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An objective method of analyzing cochlear versus noncochlear patterns of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in patients with acoustic neuromas.
Telischi F
Laryngoscope; 2000 Apr; 110(4):553-62. PubMed ID: 10763999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
Fetterman BL
Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]