171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23921943)
1. Experimental assessment of polyphonic tones with cochlear implants.
Penninger RT; Limb CJ; Vermeire K; Leman M; Dhooge I
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1267-71. PubMed ID: 23921943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perception of polyphony with cochlear implants for 2 and 3 simultaneous pitches.
Penninger RT; Kludt E; Limb CJ; Leman M; Dhooge I; Buechner A
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):431-6. PubMed ID: 24518404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the Phantom Electrode strategy to improve bass frequency perception for music listening in cochlear implant users.
Munjal T; Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S121-8. PubMed ID: 26561883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual fusion of polyphonic pitch in cochlear implant users.
Donnelly PJ; Guo BZ; Limb CJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):EL128-33. PubMed ID: 19894787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electro-acoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric pitch comparisons.
McDermott H; Sucher C; Simpson A
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():2-7. PubMed ID: 19390169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.
Bahmer A; Baumann U
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 22733121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tripolar Stimulation Improves Polyphonic Pitch Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Chari DA; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 30531636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences between electrode-assigned frequencies and cochlear implant recipient pitch perception.
Nardo WD; Cantore I; Cianfrone F; Melillo P; Fetoni AR; Paludetti G
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):370-7. PubMed ID: 17453456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
Chen JK; Chuang AY; McMahon C; Hsieh JC; Tung TH; Li LP
Pediatrics; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e793-800. PubMed ID: 20211951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a Test Battery to Assess Perception of Music in Children With Cochlear Implants.
Roy AT; Scattergood-Keepper L; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Butler C; Limb CJ
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 140(6):540-7. PubMed ID: 24722833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deeper Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Angle Improves Detection of Musical Sound Quality Deterioration Related to Bass Frequency Removal.
Roy AT; Penninger RT; Pearl MS; Wuerfel W; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Buechner A; Limb CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 26669557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
