These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23922475)
21. Validation of the Chinese version of the low anterior resection syndrome score for measuring bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery among rectal cancer patients. Hou XT; Pang D; Lu Q; Yang P; Jin SL; Zhou YJ; Tian SH Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2015 Oct; 19(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 25813530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case-control analysis. Sun G; Zang Y; Ding H; Chen Y; Groothof D; Gong H; Lou Z; Meng R; Chen Z; Furnee E; Xiang J; Zhang W Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Dec; 27(12):1275-1287. PubMed ID: 37248369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A longitudinal study of gender differences in quality of life among Japanese patients with lower rectal cancer treated with sphincter-saving surgery: a 1-year follow-up. Kinoshita Y; Chishaki A; Kawamoto R; Manabe T; Ueki T; Hirata K; Miyazono M; Kanaoka M; Tomioka A; Nakano M; Ohkusa T; Nakao H; Tanaka M; Mibu R World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():91. PubMed ID: 25880648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study. Zhou ZX; Zhao LY; Lin T; Liu H; Deng HJ; Zhu HL; Yan J; Li GX World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5505-12. PubMed ID: 25987773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Electrophysiology-based quality assurance of nerve-sparing in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: Is it worth the effort? Kauff DW; Wachter N; Bettzieche R; Lang H; Kneist W Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4525-32. PubMed ID: 26895916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sphincter-sparing surgery after preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancers: feasibility, oncologic results and quality of life outcomes. Allal AS; Bieri S; Pelloni A; Spataro V; Anchisi S; Ambrosetti P; Sprangers MA; Kurtz JM; Gertsch P Br J Cancer; 2000 Mar; 82(6):1131-7. PubMed ID: 10735495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision. Pontallier A; Denost Q; Van Geluwe B; Adam JP; Celerier B; Rullier E Surg Endosc; 2016 Nov; 30(11):4924-4933. PubMed ID: 26944728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy. Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17235719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Open Label Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Kim MJ; Park SC; Park JW; Chang HJ; Kim DY; Nam BH; Sohn DK; Oh JH Ann Surg; 2018 Feb; 267(2):243-251. PubMed ID: 28549014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives. Rouanet P; Bertrand MM; Jarlier M; Mourregot A; Traore D; Taoum C; de Forges H; Colombo PE Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3572-3579. PubMed ID: 30171509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of perioperative clinicopathologic outcome and postoperative survival of laparoscopic and open sphincter-sparing surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a retrospective study. Zhang Z; Zhang BRZSN J BUON; 2019; 24(2):464-469. PubMed ID: 31127992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life After Sphincter-Sparing Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Long-term Longitudinal Follow-up. Pieniowski EHA; Palmer GJ; Juul T; Lagergren P; Johar A; Emmertsen KJ; Nordenvall C; Abraham-Nordling M Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 Jan; 62(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 30394987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of overall survival and quality of life between patients undergoing anal reconstruction and patients undergoing traditional lower abdominal stoma after radical resection. Du P; Wang SY; Zheng PF; Mao J; Hu H; Cheng ZB Clin Transl Oncol; 2019 Oct; 21(10):1390-1397. PubMed ID: 31006088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Is There Any Difference in the Transanal TME Rectal Approach? : A Single-Center Series of 120 Consecutive Patients. Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Alline M; Boulay E; Mourregot A; Carrère S; Quénet F; Jarlier M; Rouanet P Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 26714950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bowel dysfunction after anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic sphincter-saving operative intervention for rectal cancer: A case-matched study in 46 patients using the Low Anterior Resection Score. Hain E; Manceau G; Maggiori L; Mongin C; Prost À la Denise J; Panis Y Surgery; 2017 Apr; 161(4):1028-1039. PubMed ID: 27894710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Temple LK; Bacik J; Savatta SG; Gottesman L; Paty PB; Weiser MR; Guillem JG; Minsky BD; Kalman M; Thaler HT; Schrag D; Wong WD Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Jul; 48(7):1353-65. PubMed ID: 15868235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Construction of a nomogram model to predict technical difficulty in performing laparoscopic sphincter-preserving radical resection for rectal cancer. Zhou XC; Guan SW; Ke FY; Dhamija G; Wang Q; Chen BF World J Gastroenterol; 2024 May; 30(18):2418-2439. PubMed ID: 38764764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]