These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23922941)

  • 1. Coordinate based meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data; false discovery control and diagnostics.
    Tench CR; Tanasescu R; Auer DP; Constantinescu CS
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e70143. PubMed ID: 23922941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coordinate based random effect size meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.
    Tench CR; Tanasescu R; Constantinescu CS; Auer DP; Cottam WJ
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jun; 153():293-306. PubMed ID: 28389386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coordinate based meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data using activation likelihood estimation; full width half max and group comparisons.
    Tench CR; Tanasescu R; Auer DP; Cottam WJ; Constantinescu CS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106735. PubMed ID: 25226581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty.
    Eickhoff SB; Laird AR; Grefkes C; Wang LE; Zilles K; Fox PT
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2907-26. PubMed ID: 19172646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited.
    Eickhoff SB; Bzdok D; Laird AR; Kurth F; Fox PT
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2349-61. PubMed ID: 21963913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analyses.
    Turkeltaub PE; Eickhoff SB; Laird AR; Fox M; Wiener M; Fox P
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2012 Jan; 33(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21305667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying functional subdivisions in the human brain using meta-analytic activation modeling-based parcellation.
    Yang Y; Fan L; Chu C; Zhuo J; Wang J; Fox PT; Eickhoff SB; Jiang T
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):300-309. PubMed ID: 26296500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ALE meta-analysis: controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts.
    Laird AR; Fox PM; Price CJ; Glahn DC; Uecker AM; Lancaster JL; Turkeltaub PE; Kochunov P; Fox PT
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 May; 25(1):155-64. PubMed ID: 15846811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Behavior, sensitivity, and power of activation likelihood estimation characterized by massive empirical simulation.
    Eickhoff SB; Nichols TE; Laird AR; Hoffstaedter F; Amunts K; Fox PT; Bzdok D; Eickhoff CR
    Neuroimage; 2016 Aug; 137():70-85. PubMed ID: 27179606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A parametric approach to voxel-based meta-analysis.
    Costafreda SG; David AS; Brammer MJ
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19457393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI.
    Acar F; Seurinck R; Eickhoff SB; Moerkerke B
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0208177. PubMed ID: 30500854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. BrainMap VBM: An environment for structural meta-analysis.
    Vanasse TJ; Fox PM; Barron DS; Robertson M; Eickhoff SB; Lancaster JL; Fox PT
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Aug; 39(8):3308-3325. PubMed ID: 29717540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of spatial thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.
    Logan BR; Geliazkova MP; Rowe DB
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1379-89. PubMed ID: 18064589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coordinate based meta-analysis of networks in neuroimaging studies.
    Tench CR; Tanasescu R; Constantinescu CS; Cottam WJ; Auer DP
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jan; 205():116259. PubMed ID: 31626896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What do results from coordinate-based meta-analyses tell us?
    Albajes-Eizagirre A; Radua J
    Neuroimage; 2018 Aug; 176():550-553. PubMed ID: 29729389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Co-activation Probability Estimation (CoPE): An approach for modeling functional co-activation architecture based on neuroimaging coordinates.
    Chu C; Fan L; Eickhoff CR; Liu Y; Yang Y; Eickhoff SB; Jiang T
    Neuroimage; 2015 Aug; 117():397-407. PubMed ID: 26037052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the sensitivity of cluster-based statistics for functional magnetic resonance imaging data.
    Geerligs L; Maris E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Jun; 42(9):2746-2765. PubMed ID: 33724597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the disparity between Talairach and MNI coordinates in functional neuroimaging data: validation of the Lancaster transform.
    Laird AR; Robinson JL; McMillan KM; Tordesillas-Gutiérrez D; Moran ST; Gonzales SM; Ray KL; Franklin C; Glahn DC; Fox PT; Lancaster JL
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jun; 51(2):677-83. PubMed ID: 20197097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the prevalence of missing experiments in a neuroimaging meta-analysis.
    Samartsidis P; Montagna S; Laird AR; Fox PT; Johnson TD; Nichols TE
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):866-883. PubMed ID: 32860642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cluster-based analysis of FMRI data.
    Heller R; Stanley D; Yekutieli D; Rubin N; Benjamini Y
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):599-608. PubMed ID: 16952467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.