These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23923099)

  • 1. Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.
    Giustini D; Boulos MN
    Online J Public Health Inform; 2013; 5(2):214. PubMed ID: 23923099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM; Anderson P
    Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2():115. PubMed ID: 24360284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching.
    Haddaway NR; Collins AM; Coughlin D; Kirk S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138237. PubMed ID: 26379270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM
    Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews.
    Gehanno JF; Rollin L; Darmoni S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2013 Jan; 13():7. PubMed ID: 23302542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough.
    Boeker M; Vach W; Motschall E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Oct; 13():131. PubMed ID: 24160679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commentary to Gusenbauer and Haddaway 2020: Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar and PubMed.
    Klopfenstein DV; Dampier W
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):126-135. PubMed ID: 33031632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions.
    Wright K; Golder S; Rodriguez-Lopez R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():73. PubMed ID: 24893958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
    Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review case study of urgent and emergency care configuration found citation searching of Web of Science and Google Scholar of similar value.
    Cantrell A; Booth A; Chambers D
    Health Info Libr J; 2024 Jun; 41(2):166-181. PubMed ID: 35289476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Database selection and data gathering methods in systematic reviews of qualitative research regarding diabetes mellitus - an explorative study.
    Justesen T; Freyberg J; Schultz ANØ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):94. PubMed ID: 33941105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Google Scholar as a Sole Literature Source for Meta-analyses in Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.
    Ungar OJ; Muhanna N; Chaushu H
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(2):864-870. PubMed ID: 37275023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Literature search on risk factors for sarcoma: PubMed and Google Scholar may be complementary sources.
    Mastrangelo G; Fadda E; Rossi CR; Zamprogno E; Buja A; Cegolon L
    BMC Res Notes; 2010 May; 3():131. PubMed ID: 20459746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches.
    Shariff SZ; Bejaimal SA; Sontrop JM; Iansavichus AV; Haynes RB; Weir MA; Garg AX
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e164. PubMed ID: 23948488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources.
    Gusenbauer M; Haddaway NR
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):181-217. PubMed ID: 31614060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.
    Hanneke R; Young SK
    Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):156. PubMed ID: 28789703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supplementary strategies identified additional eligible studies in qualitative systematic reviews.
    Frandsen TF; Eriksen MB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():85-91. PubMed ID: 37201687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar literature searches.
    Anders ME; Evans DP
    Respir Care; 2010 May; 55(5):578-83. PubMed ID: 20420728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with Web of Science and Google Scholar.
    Levay P; Ainsworth N; Kettle R; Morgan A
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 26147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.