These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Influence of matrix type on surface roughness of three resins for provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures. Ayuso-Montero R; Martinez-Gomis J; Lujan-Climent M; Salsench J; Peraire M J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 19054307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Note: An adhesion measurement setup for bioinspired fibrillar surfaces using flat probes. Kroner E; Blau J; Arzt E Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 Jan; 83(1):016101. PubMed ID: 22299997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Influence of surface roughness on oral streptococcal adhesion forces to dental filling materials]. Sainan Z; Li J; Lei Z; Liying H; Lu Y; Wei L Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 34(5):448-453. PubMed ID: 28326699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Enhancement of the growth of human endothelial cells by surface roughness at nanometer scale. Chung TW; Liu DZ; Wang SY; Wang SS Biomaterials; 2003 Nov; 24(25):4655-61. PubMed ID: 12951008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Determination of solid surface tension from particle-substrate pull-off forces measured with the atomic force microscope. Drelich J; Tormoen GW; Beach ER J Colloid Interface Sci; 2004 Dec; 280(2):484-97. PubMed ID: 15533421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Reverse adhesion of a gecko-inspired synthetic adhesive switched by an ion-exchange polymer-metal composite actuator. Guo DJ; Liu R; Cheng Y; Zhang H; Zhou LM; Fang SM; Elliott WH; Tan W ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Mar; 7(9):5480-7. PubMed ID: 25676143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Adhesion of elastomeric impression materials to trays. Bindra B; Heath JR J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9049922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The effect of tray material and surface condition on the shear bond strength of impression materials. Wang RR; Nguyen T; Boyle AM J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8809248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Estimation of the strength of adhesion between a thermoresponsive polymer coating and nitinol wire. Burke M; Clarke B; Rochev Y; Gorelov A; Carroll W J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2008 May; 19(5):1971-9. PubMed ID: 17943418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Surface roughness effects on attachment ability of the spider Philodromus dispar (Araneae, Philodromidae). Wolff JO; Gorb SN J Exp Biol; 2012 Jan; 215(Pt 1):179-84. PubMed ID: 22162866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Complementary effect of attachment devices in stick insects (Phasmatodea). Büscher TH; Gorb SN J Exp Biol; 2019 Nov; 222(Pt 23):. PubMed ID: 31727762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Harnessing tunable scanning probe techniques to measure shear enhanced adhesion of gecko-inspired fibrillar arrays. Li Y; Zhou JH; Zhang C; Menon C; Gates BD ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Feb; 7(4):2340-8. PubMed ID: 25547122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions. Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A Novel Bioinspired Switchable Adhesive with Three Distinct Adhesive States. Isla PY; Kroner E Adv Funct Mater; 2015 Apr; 25(16):2444-2450. PubMed ID: 26366145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A Physical Model Approach to Gecko Adhesion Opportunity and Constraint: How Rough Could It Be? Niewiarowski PH; Dhinojwala A; Garner AM Integr Comp Biol; 2019 Jul; 59(1):203-213. PubMed ID: 31065674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]