56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23926194)
21. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in bovine pericardial aortic valves: evaluation using 3 different modalities and associated medium-term outcomes.
Chacko SJ; Ansari AH; McCarthy PM; Malaisrie SC; Andrei AC; Li Z; Lee R; McGee E; Bonow RO; Puthumana JJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):776-83. PubMed ID: 23926194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predictors and Outcomes of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.
Dayan V; Vignolo G; Soca G; Paganini JJ; Brusich D; Pibarot P
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Aug; 9(8):924-33. PubMed ID: 27236530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of the indexed effective orifice area on mid-term cardiac-related mortality after aortic valve replacement.
Bleiziffer S; Ali A; Hettich IM; Akdere D; Laubender RP; Ruzicka D; Boehm J; Lange R; Eichinger W
Heart; 2010 Jun; 96(11):865-71. PubMed ID: 20406767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Aortic valve replacement with a small valve prosthesis: a review of clinical and echocardiographic studies for impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch].
Aoyagi S; Yoshikawa K
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Mar; 108(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 17405538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is patient-prosthesis mismatch an independent risk factor for early and mid-term overall mortality in adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Urso S; Sadaba R; Aldamiz-Echevarria G
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Sep; 9(3):510-8. PubMed ID: 19497953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis--clinical performance.
Jamieson WR; Koerfer R; Yankah CA; Zittermann A; Hayden RI; Ling H; Hetzer R; Dolman WB
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Nov; 36(5):818-24. PubMed ID: 19700338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. New recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound.
Zoghbi WA
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2010; 6(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 20360654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in aortic stenosis.
Honda K; Okamura Y
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 62(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 24132681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prosthesis-patient mismatch following aortic and mitral valves replacement - A comprehensive review.
Joury A; Duran A; Stewart M; Gilliland YE; Spindel SM; Qamruddin S
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2022; 72():84-92. PubMed ID: 35235847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Where is the common sense in aortic valve replacement? A review of hemodynamics and sizing of stented tissue valves.
Doenst T; Amorim PA; Al-Alam N; Lehmann S; Mukherjee C; Faerber G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Nov; 142(5):1180-7. PubMed ID: 21703637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years.
Head SJ; Mokhles MM; Osnabrugge RL; Pibarot P; Mack MJ; Takkenberg JJ; Bogers AJ; Kappetein AP
Eur Heart J; 2012 Jun; 33(12):1518-29. PubMed ID: 22408037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Aortic Valve Surgery in Nonelderly Patients: Insights Gained From AVIATOR.
Lansac E; Youssefi P; de Heer F; Bavaria J; De Kerchove L; El-Hamamsy I; Elkhoury G; Enriquez-Sarano M; Jondeau LG; Kluin J; Pibarot P; Schäfers HJ; Vanoverschelde JL; Takkenberg JJM;
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Winter; 31(4):643-649. PubMed ID: 31229691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease.
David TE
Nat Rev Cardiol; 2013 Jul; 10(7):375-86. PubMed ID: 23670613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement.
Bilkhu R; Jahangiri M; Otto CM
Heart; 2019 Mar; 105(Suppl 2):s28-s33. PubMed ID: 30846522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patterns of use and durability for the Mitroflow aortic valve: a systematic review of the literature.
Fischlein T; Pfeiffer S; Bagnardi V; Santarpino G
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Dec; 58(6):916-930. PubMed ID: 28548475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of prosthetic valve dysfunction with the use of echocardiography.
Beigel R; Siegel RJ
Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2014; 15(4):332-50. PubMed ID: 25662927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does patient-prosthesis mismatch have a negative impact on outcomes following mitral valve replacement?
Aboul-Hassan SS; Stankowski T; Marczak J; Cichon R
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1027-1034. PubMed ID: 29370372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bioengineering strategies for polymeric scaffold for tissue engineering an aortic heart valve: an update.
Morsi YS
Int J Artif Organs; 2014 Sep; 37(9):651-67. PubMed ID: 25262629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Lack of Accessible Data on Prosthetic Heart Valves.
Frank M; Ganzoni G; Starck C; Grünenfelder J; Corti R; Gruner C; Hürlimann D; Tanner FC; Jenni R; Greutmann M; Biaggi P
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 26645684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
