149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23926225)
21. Using the entrapment sequence method as a standard to evaluate key steps of proteomics data analysis process.
Feng XD; Li LW; Zhang JH; Zhu YP; Chang C; Shu KX; Ma J
BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 2):143. PubMed ID: 28361671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Scalable Approach for Protein False Discovery Rate Estimation in Large Proteomic Data Sets.
Savitski MM; Wilhelm M; Hahne H; Kuster B; Bantscheff M
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2015 Sep; 14(9):2394-404. PubMed ID: 25987413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Target-decoy false discovery rate estimation using Crema.
Lin A; See D; Fondrie WE; Keich U; Noble WS
Proteomics; 2024 Apr; 24(8):e2300084. PubMed ID: 38380501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In-depth analysis of protein inference algorithms using multiple search engines and well-defined metrics.
Audain E; Uszkoreit J; Sachsenberg T; Pfeuffer J; Liang X; Hermjakob H; Sanchez A; Eisenacher M; Reinert K; Tabb DL; Kohlbacher O; Perez-Riverol Y
J Proteomics; 2017 Jan; 150():170-182. PubMed ID: 27498275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Target-small decoy search strategy for false discovery rate estimation.
Kim H; Lee S; Park H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Aug; 20(1):438. PubMed ID: 31443634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. New mixture models for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in mass spectrometry proteomics.
Peng Y; Jain S; Li YF; Greguš M; Ivanov AR; Vitek O; Radivojac P
Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 36(Suppl_2):i745-i753. PubMed ID: 33381824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Challenging Targets or Describing Mismatches? A Comment on Common Decoy Distribution by Madej et al.
Etourneau L; Burger T
J Proteome Res; 2022 Dec; 21(12):2840-2845. PubMed ID: 36305797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Protein Probability Model for High-Throughput Protein Identification by Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.
Prieto G; Vázquez J
J Proteome Res; 2020 Mar; 19(3):1285-1297. PubMed ID: 32037837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Targeted Feature Detection for Data-Dependent Shotgun Proteomics.
Weisser H; Choudhary JS
J Proteome Res; 2017 Aug; 16(8):2964-2974. PubMed ID: 28673088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Empirical approach to false discovery rate estimation in shotgun proteomics.
Goloborodko AA; Mayerhofer C; Zubarev AR; Tarasova IA; Gorshkov AV; Zubarev RA; Gorshkov MV
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2010 Feb; 24(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 20069687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Artificial decoy spectral libraries for false discovery rate estimation in spectral library searching in proteomics.
Lam H; Deutsch EW; Aebersold R
J Proteome Res; 2010 Jan; 9(1):605-10. PubMed ID: 19916561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Target-decoy approach and false discovery rate: when things may go wrong.
Gupta N; Bandeira N; Keich U; Pevzner PA
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2011 Jul; 22(7):1111-20. PubMed ID: 21953092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A peptide-retrieval strategy enables significant improvement of quantitative performance without compromising confidence of identification.
Tu C; Shen S; Sheng Q; Shyr Y; Qu J
J Proteomics; 2017 Jan; 152():276-282. PubMed ID: 27903464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Averaging Strategy To Reduce Variability in Target-Decoy Estimates of False Discovery Rate.
Keich U; Tamura K; Noble WS
J Proteome Res; 2019 Feb; 18(2):585-593. PubMed ID: 30560673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. False discovery rates in spectral identification.
Jeong K; Kim S; Bandeira N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 16(Suppl 16):S2. PubMed ID: 23176207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MUDE: a new approach for optimizing sensitivity in the target-decoy search strategy for large-scale peptide/protein identification.
Cerqueira FR; Graber A; Schwikowski B; Baumgartner C
J Proteome Res; 2010 May; 9(5):2265-77. PubMed ID: 20199108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving Peptide-Level Mass Spectrometry Analysis via Double Competition.
Lin A; Short T; Noble WS; Keich U
J Proteome Res; 2022 Oct; 21(10):2412-2420. PubMed ID: 36166314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MUMAL2: Improving sensitivity in shotgun proteomics using cost sensitive artificial neural networks and a threshold selector algorithm.
Cerqueira FR; Ricardo AM; de Paiva Oliveira A; Graber A; Baumgartner C
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 18):472. PubMed ID: 28105913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An improved method for the construction of decoy peptide MS/MS spectra suitable for the accurate estimation of false discovery rates.
Ahrné E; Ohta Y; Nikitin F; Scherl A; Lisacek F; Müller M
Proteomics; 2011 Oct; 11(20):4085-95. PubMed ID: 21898822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An easy-to-use Decoy Database Builder software tool, implementing different decoy strategies for false discovery rate calculation in automated MS/MS protein identifications.
Reidegeld KA; Eisenacher M; Kohl M; Chamrad D; Körting G; Blüggel M; Meyer HE; Stephan C
Proteomics; 2008 Mar; 8(6):1129-37. PubMed ID: 18338823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
