243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2392650)
21. [The clinical value of contrast CT in lymph node staging in the neck region].
Bongers H; Klier R; Ozdoba C; Lenz M
Rofo; 1990 Apr; 152(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 2160098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Molecular staging of cervical lymph nodes in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Ferris RL; Xi L; Raja S; Hunt JL; Wang J; Gooding WE; Kelly L; Ching J; Luketich JD; Godfrey TE
Cancer Res; 2005 Mar; 65(6):2147-56. PubMed ID: 15781625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Metastases of germ cell tumors to the ENT area--a rare differential diagnosis of lymph node metastases in unknown primary tumor].
Büttner H; Rosanowski F; Pottek T; Hartmann M
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Oct; 75(10):616-8. PubMed ID: 9035666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in head-neck tumors. Methods, chief criteria, differential diagnosis and clinical results].
Lenz M
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr Erganzungsbd; 1992; 130():1-199. PubMed ID: 1339587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of sonography and CT for differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Sumi M; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 11264102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Lymph node metastases of the neck in unknown primary tumor: is there a differential imaging diagnosis?].
Steinkamp HJ; Knöbber D; Zwicker C; Felix R
Laryngorhinootologie; 1993 Feb; 72(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 8461101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Cervical lymph node metastasis: significance of computerized tomography and palpation. A histologically controlled comparison].
Steinkamp HJ; Zwicker C; Langer M; Mathe F; Uhrmeister P
Rofo; 1991 Oct; 155(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 1932725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [B-image sonography in lymph node staging of the head and neck area. A comparison with palpation, computerized and magnetic resonance tomography].
Quetz JU; Rohr S; Hoffmann P; Wustrow J; Mertens J
HNO; 1991 Feb; 39(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 2032876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Necrosis in metastatic neck nodes: diagnostic accuracy of CT, MR imaging, and US.
King AD; Tse GM; Ahuja AT; Yuen EH; Vlantis AC; To EW; van Hasselt AC
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 14990838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Cervical lymph node metastases: a histologically controlled comparison of palpation, sonography and computed tomography].
Leicher-Düber A; Bleier R; Düber C; Thelen M
Rofo; 1990 Nov; 153(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 2173066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a differential diagnosis of otogenic facial paralysis].
Laubert A; Mausolf A; Bernhards J; Le Blanc S; Werner M
HNO; 1991 Mar; 39(3):98-101. PubMed ID: 2050557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Analytical study of 510 cases of surgical lymph node biopsies].
Sabeti H; Mohabat-Ayin A
Acta Med Iran; 1975; 18(1-2):5-19. PubMed ID: 782173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Problem of pretherapeutic staging of cervical carcinoma. Studies of the diagnostic value of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in comparison with gynecologic palpation findings and pathologic-anatomic diagnosis].
Zapf S; Halbsguth A; Schweden F; Klose K; Lochner B; Beck T; Friese K; Kreienberg R
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Dec; 47(12):838-42. PubMed ID: 3436507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Ultrasound, computerized and nuclear magnetic resonance tomography of soft tissue processes of the head and neck].
Brinkmann G; Brix F; Beigel A
Rontgenblatter; 1990 Feb; 43(2):58-64. PubMed ID: 2181602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [The extracapsular spread of cervical lymph node metastases: the diagnostic value of computed tomography].
Steinkamp HJ; van der Hoeck E; Böck JC; Felix R
Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10370409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [CT scanning of the cervical lymph node metastases: compared with histologic sections].
Xu W; Liu D; Lu Z
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Mar; 12(3):99-102. PubMed ID: 11189141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography?
Haberal I; Celik H; Göçmen H; Akmansu H; Yörük M; Ozeri C
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Feb; 130(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 14990916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis.
Som PM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 May; 158(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 1566697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Critical evaluation of 245 cases of lymph node biopsy].
Chiarioni S; Monarca B; Ravazzolo E; Mandelli F
Recenti Prog Med; 1990 May; 81(5):310-7. PubMed ID: 2377808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Cervical lymph node metastasis: CT, ultrasound versus physical palpation].
Luo D; Shi M; Xu Z
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1998 Jan; 20(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 10921058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
