BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2392660)

  • 21. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
    Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Omnicarbon tilting-disc heart valve prosthesis. A clinical and Doppler echocardiographic follow-up.
    Peter M; Weiss P; Jenzer HR; Hoffmann A; Dubach P; Roth J; Bertschmann W; Stulz P; Grädel E; Burckhardt D
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Oct; 106(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 8412252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
    David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Late results after left-sided cardiac valve replacement in children.
    Milano A; Vouhé PR; Baillot-Vernant F; Donzeau-Gouge P; Trinquet F; Roux PM; Leca F; Neveux JY
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 92(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 3736079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Mitral valve replacement with bioprosthesis in children].
    Mostefa-Kara M; Blin D; Langlet F; Mouly A; Goudard A; Montiès JR
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1984 Feb; 77(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 6424600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term clinical results after mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
    Lindblom D
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Feb; 95(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 3339899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Medtronic-Hall prosthesis: valve related deaths and complications.
    Beaudet RL; Nakhle G; Beaulieu CR; Doyle D; Gauvin C; Poirier NL
    Can J Cardiol; 1988 Oct; 4(7):376-80. PubMed ID: 3228765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The Mitroflow bioprosthesis. Results after 6 years].
    Revuelta JM; Bernal JM; Rabasa JM; Alonso C; Lequerica MA; Gutiérrez JA; Gaite L
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1989 Nov; 42(9):614-9. PubMed ID: 2616845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Long-term results of isolated mitral valve replacement using bioprosthesis].
    Yao H; Miyamoto T; Murata H
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jun; 41(6):969-74. PubMed ID: 8336048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Carpentier's supra-annular bioprosthesis in aortic position: a mid-term evaluation].
    Fournial G; Laghzaoui A; Roux D; Glock Y
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1995 Dec; 88(12):1841-6. PubMed ID: 8729364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.
    Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up.
    Hammond GL; Geha AS; Kopf GS; Hashim SW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
    Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Four years' experience with the Edwards-Tekna bileaflet valve prosthesis.
    Calkavur T; Yagdi T; Apaydin A; Islamoglu F; Posacioglu H; Durmaz I; Ozbaran M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 12000170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
    Borger MA; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Christie-Hrybinsky D; Feindel CM; David TE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):49-55; discussion 55-6. PubMed ID: 16480012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Early and late prognosis after reoperation for prosthetic valve replacement.
    Bosch X; Pomar JL; Pelletier LC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Oct; 88(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 6482488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Valvuloplasty for rheumatic mitral valve disease. A surgical challenge.
    Antunes MJ; Magalhaes MP; Colsen PR; Kinsley RH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 3600007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surgical treatment of infective mitral valve endocarditis: predictors of early and late outcome.
    Alexiou C; Langley SM; Stafford H; Haw MP; Livesey SA; Monro JL
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 10888086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.