BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23926722)

  • 1. The reintroduction of an effective cavity liner.
    Weiner RS
    Dent Today; 2013 Jul; 32(7):136-7. PubMed ID: 23926722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical study of adhesive amalgam in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML; Tylka JA; Sandrik J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Apr; 20(4):331-4, 336, 338 passim; quiz 344. PubMed ID: 11692340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of base/liner use on restoration leakage.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Marshall KR; Holman BG
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 16689065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the compressive strength of calcium hydroxide based lining materials.
    Shazad N; Kennedy JG
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Sep; 3(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 8603149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
    Royse MC; Ott NW; Mathieu GP
    Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
    Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cavity sealers, liners, and bases: current philosophies and indications for use.
    Hilton TJ
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):134-46. PubMed ID: 8957903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conservative restoration of compromised posterior teeth with direct composites: a 7-year report.
    Magne P
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 12(8):747-9. PubMed ID: 11404870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of water spray on lining materials and their adhesion to composite and dentin cavity walls.
    Ben-Amar A; Geiger S; Liberman R
    Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 1667641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of different liner treatments on postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Hucke RD; Smith GE
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 10323159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Enamel-dentinal adhesives in amalgam restorations].
    Anderlini G; Calandriello R
    Dent Cadmos; 1989 Apr; 57(6):72-8, 81. PubMed ID: 2636183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using Amalgambond and Copalite.
    Edgren BN; Denehy GE
    Am J Dent; 1992 Dec; 5(6):296-8. PubMed ID: 1304174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence summary: which dental liners under amalgam restorations are more effective in reducing postoperative sensitivity?
    Nasser M
    Br Dent J; 2011 Jun; 210(11):533-7. PubMed ID: 21660022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recreating Mother Nature with direct resin restorations.
    Nazarian A
    Dent Today; 2009 Apr; 28(4):82, 84. PubMed ID: 19408587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluations of the interface between amalgam and dentin with a single component dentin bonding system.
    Estafan D; Gultz J; Pines M; Scherer W
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(2):190-2. PubMed ID: 11199580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended Class II cavities after six years.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Feilzer AJ; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2011 May; 27(5):455-64. PubMed ID: 21397316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.