These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23926735)

  • 1. Revision surgery for failed unicompartmental knee replacement: technical aspects and clinical outcome.
    Robb CA; Matharu GS; Baloch K; Pynsent PB
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2013 Jun; 79(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 23926735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacement to total knee replacement.
    Chou DT; Swamy GN; Lewis JR; Badhe NP
    Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):356-9. PubMed ID: 21636281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty - results of a multicentre study.
    Saldanha KA; Keys GW; Svard UC; White SH; Rao C
    Knee; 2007 Aug; 14(4):275-9. PubMed ID: 17524650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revision of medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement to a total knee replacement: similar to a primary?
    Wynn Jones H; Chan W; Harrison T; Smith TO; Masonda P; Walton NP
    Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 21531140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry.
    Pearse AJ; Hooper GJ; Rothwell A; Frampton C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 20357326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases.
    Pandit H; Jenkins C; Gill HS; Barker K; Dodd CA; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21282759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement.
    Furnes O; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Vollset SE; Engesaeter LB; Havelin LI
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Mar; 89(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17332100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved fixation in cementless unicompartmental knee replacement: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Pandit H; Liddle AD; Kendrick BJ; Jenkins C; Price AJ; Gill HS; Dodd CA; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Aug; 95(15):1365-72. PubMed ID: 23925740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survivorship of the St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental knee replacement beyond ten years.
    Steele RG; Hutabarat S; Evans RL; Ackroyd CE; Newman JH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Sep; 88(9):1164-8. PubMed ID: 16943465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: the challenges and need for augments.
    Khan Z; Nawaz SZ; Kahane S; Esler C; Chatterji U
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2013 Dec; 79(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 24563977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties revised to total knee arthroplasties compared with primary total knee arthroplasties.
    Rancourt MF; Kemp KA; Plamondon SM; Kim PR; Dervin GF
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Sep; 27(8 Suppl):106-10. PubMed ID: 22503493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with bone allograft in 30 cases.
    Franke KF; Nusem I; Gamboa G; Morgan DA
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2013 Aug; 79(4):427-34. PubMed ID: 24205774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Minimally Invasive Stryker-Osteonics unicondylar knee prosthesis with metal-backed tibia component: a 5-year follow-up].
    Endres S; Steinheiser E; Wilke A
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 16224679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A note of caution!
    Luscombe KL; Lim J; Jones PW; White SH
    Int Orthop; 2007 Jun; 31(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 16896865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry.
    Gioe TJ; Killeen KK; Hoeffel DP; Bert JM; Comfort TK; Scheltema K; Mehle S; Grimm K
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):111-9. PubMed ID: 14646749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: survival and the affect of age and gender.
    Matharu G; Robb C; Baloch K; Pynsent P
    Knee; 2012 Dec; 19(6):913-7. PubMed ID: 22480781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The survivorship and results of total knee replacements converted from unicompartmental knee replacements.
    Johnson S; Jones P; Newman JH
    Knee; 2007 Mar; 14(2):154-7. PubMed ID: 17276070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical aspects of revision and functional outcome after revision of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Somford MP; Brouwer RW; Haen PW; van Raay JJ; van Raaij TM
    Knee; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1020-1023. PubMed ID: 27624394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis for the treatment of medial compartment knee disease: 2 to 5 year follow-up.
    Heller S; Fenichel I; Salai M; Luria T; Velkes S
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2009 May; 11(5):266-8. PubMed ID: 19637502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is unicompartmental-to-unicompartmental revision knee arthroplasty a reliable option? Case-control study.
    Epinette JA; Leyder M; Saragaglia D; Pasquier G; Deschamps G;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Feb; 100(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 24373806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.