These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape. Shen Y; Kern AB; Richards VM J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Feb; 62(2):442-455. PubMed ID: 30950687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of the binaural auditory filter using a detection task. Kolarik AJ; Culling JF J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3009-17. PubMed ID: 21117750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones. Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time and frequency metrics related to auditory masking of a 10 kHz tone in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Branstetter BK; Trickey JS; Aihara H; Finneran JJ; Liberman TR J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):4556. PubMed ID: 25669265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Narrow noise band detection in a complex masker: masking level difference due to harmonicity. Deroche ML; Culling JF Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):225-35. PubMed ID: 21820501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning to detect a tone in unpredictable noise. Jones PR; Moore DR; Shub DE; Amitay S J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):EL128-33. PubMed ID: 24606305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between MOC reflex and masked threshold. Garinis A; Werner L; Abdala C Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 21878379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The monaural temporal window based on masking period pattern data in school-aged children and adults. Buss E; He S; Grose JH; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1586-97. PubMed ID: 23464028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of masker fringes for the detection of coherent tone pips. Richards VM; Shub DE; Carreira EM J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):883-92. PubMed ID: 21877803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of auditory filter shapes derived with three different maskers. Glasberg BR; Moore BC; Nimmo-Smith I J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Feb; 75(2):536-44. PubMed ID: 6699291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Target enhancement and noise cancellation in the identification of a rudimentary sound source in noise. Lutfi RA; Liu CJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):EL52-6. PubMed ID: 21361412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of envelope statistics in detecting changes in interaural correlation. Goupell MJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1561-72. PubMed ID: 22978885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of the center frequency of the highest modulation filter. Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Sek A J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1075-81. PubMed ID: 19206882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and evaluation of the Mandarin speech signal content on the acceptable noise level test in listeners with normal hearing in mainland China. Chen J; Zhang H; Plyler PN; Cao W; Chen J Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 21599613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time-efficient measures of auditory frequency selectivity. Charaziak KK; Souza P; Siegel JH Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 22107443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduction of internal noise in auditory perceptual learning. Jones PR; Moore DR; Amitay S; Shub DE J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):970-81. PubMed ID: 23363114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]