128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23927117)
1. Priming of lowpass-filtered speech affects response bias, not sensitivity, in a bandwidth discrimination task.
Freyman RL; Griffin AM; Macmillan NA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1183-92. PubMed ID: 23927117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
Jones JA; Freyman RL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments Between Text and Partially Masked Speech.
Freyman RL; Terpening J; Costanzi AC; Helfer KS
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):672-680. PubMed ID: 28650352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A model-based analysis of the "combined-stimulation advantage".
Seldran F; Micheyl C; Truy E; Berger-Vachon C; Thai-Van H; Gallego S
Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):252-64. PubMed ID: 21801823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adding irrelevant information to the content prime reduces the prime-induced unmasking effect on speech recognition.
Wu M; Li H; Gao Y; Lei M; Teng X; Wu X; Li L
Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):136-43. PubMed ID: 22101022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of lowpass and highpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine structure or envelope cues.
Ardoint M; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):89-95. PubMed ID: 19963053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gender Identification Using High-Frequency Speech Energy: Effects of Increasing the Low-Frequency Limit.
Donai JJ; Halbritter RM
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27556518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal effects in priming of masked and degraded speech.
Freyman RL; Morse-Fortier C; Griffin AM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1418-27. PubMed ID: 26428780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative importance of different spectral bands to consonant identification: relevance for frequency transposition in hearing aids.
Vickers D; Robinson JD; Füllgrabe C; Baer T; Moore BC
Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(6):334-45. PubMed ID: 19925341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pitch strength of noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes in normal-hearing listeners.
Shofner WP; Campbell J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL398-404. PubMed ID: 23145701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Listeners' attitudes toward accented talkers uniquely predicts accented speech perception.
Ingvalson EM; Lansford KL; Federova V; Fernandez G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL234. PubMed ID: 28372098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners.
Liu C; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL189-95. PubMed ID: 22979831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an adaptive low-pass filtered speech test for the identification of auditory processing disorders.
O'Beirne GA; McGaffin AJ; Rickard NA
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 22402015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.
Lee JH; Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1700-17. PubMed ID: 22978898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.
Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Marrone N
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1965-78. PubMed ID: 20968368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.
Chatterjee M; Peng SC
Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 18093766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length cues on sentence segregation by listeners with hearing loss.
Mackersie CL; Dewey J; Guthrie LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):1006-19. PubMed ID: 21877813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
