These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23927117)

  • 21. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception of prosody in normal and whispered French.
    Heeren WF; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):2026-40. PubMed ID: 25235001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. "Say-stay" identification and psychoacoustic performance of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson PB; Nittrouer S; Norton SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1830-8. PubMed ID: 7699164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution.
    Jin SH; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):881-9. PubMed ID: 20707457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auditory temporal-order processing of vowel sequences by young and elderly listeners.
    Fogerty D; Humes LE; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2509-520. PubMed ID: 20370033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.
    Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2246-56. PubMed ID: 15139635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Content and procedural learning in repeated sentence tests of speech perception.
    Yund EW; Woods DL
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 20562624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The relationship between inexperienced listeners' perceptions and acoustic correlates of children's /r/ productions.
    Klein HB; Grigos MI; McAllister Byun T; Davidson L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2012 Jul; 26(7):628-45. PubMed ID: 22690718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech recognition as a function of high-pass filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions.
    Vinay ; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):542-53. PubMed ID: 17622189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech perception in tinnitus is related to individual distress level - A neurophysiological study.
    Jagoda L; Giroud N; Neff P; Kegel A; Kleinjung T; Meyer M
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():48-58. PubMed ID: 30031353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of temporal stimulus properties on the perception of across-frequency asynchrony.
    Wojtczak M; Beim JA; Micheyl C; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):982-97. PubMed ID: 23363115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Mackersie CL; Prida TL; Stiles D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 44(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 11218102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-language perceptual similarity predicts categorial discrimination of American vowels by naïve Japanese listeners.
    Strange W; Hisagi M; Akahane-Yamada R; Kubo R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL226-31. PubMed ID: 21974496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visually guided auditory attention in a dynamic "cocktail-party" speech perception task: ERP evidence for age-related differences.
    Getzmann S; Wascher E
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():98-108. PubMed ID: 27825858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Masking effects of speech and music: does the masker's hierarchical structure matter?
    Shi LF; Law Y
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Apr; 49(4):296-308. PubMed ID: 20151877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.