These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23927117)
41. Visually guided auditory attention in a dynamic "cocktail-party" speech perception task: ERP evidence for age-related differences. Getzmann S; Wascher E Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():98-108. PubMed ID: 27825858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Masking effects of speech and music: does the masker's hierarchical structure matter? Shi LF; Law Y Int J Audiol; 2010 Apr; 49(4):296-308. PubMed ID: 20151877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception. Peng ZE; Wang LM J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Speech perception in low-pass filtered noise for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Kelly WJ; Jesteadt W J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 2359269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model. Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of Stimulus Level and Bandwidth on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Adults With Normal Hearing. Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):619-34. PubMed ID: 26226607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises. Shen Y; Manzano NK; Richards VM J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3613-24. PubMed ID: 26723318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background. Madsen SMK; Dau T; Oxenham AJ PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249654. PubMed ID: 33826663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A Danish open-set speech corpus for competing-speech studies. Nielsen JB; Dau T; Neher T J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):407-20. PubMed ID: 24437781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release. Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Processing of temporal fine structure as a function of age. Grose JH; Mamo SK Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):755-60. PubMed ID: 20592614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm. Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Classification and cue weighting of multidimensional stimuli with speech-like cues for young normal hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Wang X; Humes LE Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):725-45. PubMed ID: 18596642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners. King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Measuring effectiveness of semantic cues in degraded English sentences in non-native listeners. Shi LF Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 24003982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners. Won JH; Jones GL; Drennan WR; Jameyson EM; Rubinstein JT J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2088-97. PubMed ID: 21973363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]