These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23927128)

  • 1. The role of vowel perceptual cues in compensatory responses to perturbations of speech auditory feedback.
    Reilly KJ; Dougherty KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1314-23. PubMed ID: 23927128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Language dependent vowel representation in speech production.
    Mitsuya T; Samson F; Ménard L; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2993-3003. PubMed ID: 23654403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cross-language study of compensation in response to real-time formant perturbation.
    Mitsuya T; Macdonald EN; Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2978-86. PubMed ID: 22087926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of real-time cochlear implant simulation on speech production.
    Casserly ED
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2791-800. PubMed ID: 25994707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response patterns to vowel formant perturbations in children.
    Cheung ST; Thompson K; Chen JL; Yunusova Y; Beal DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2647. PubMed ID: 34717445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes.
    MacDonald EN; Goldberg R; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1059-68. PubMed ID: 20136227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vowel generalization and its relation to adaptation during perturbations of auditory feedback.
    Reilly KJ; Pettibone C
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Nov; 118(5):2925-2934. PubMed ID: 28835529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Formant compensation for auditory feedback with English vowels.
    Mitsuya T; MacDonald EN; Munhall KG; Purcell DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):413-24. PubMed ID: 26233040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occlusion effect on compensatory formant production and voice amplitude in response to real-time perturbation.
    Mitsuya T; Purcell DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4017. PubMed ID: 28040002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compensatory Responses to Formant Perturbations Proportionally Decrease as Perturbations Increase.
    Daliri A; Chao SC; Fitzgerald LC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Oct; 63(10):3392-3407. PubMed ID: 32976078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of Polish Vowels of Tracheoesophageal Speakers.
    Mięsikowska M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):263.e5-263.e11. PubMed ID: 27160042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Durations of American English vowels by native and non-native speakers: acoustic analyses and perceptual effects.
    Liu C; Jin SH; Chen CT
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):238-53. PubMed ID: 25102608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of deafness on acoustic characteristics of American English tense/lax vowels in maternal speech to infants.
    Kondaurova MV; Bergeson TR; Dilley LC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1039-49. PubMed ID: 22894224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compensatory responses to loudness-shifted voice feedback during production of Mandarin speech.
    Liu H; Zhang Q; Xu Y; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2405-12. PubMed ID: 17902874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback.
    MacDonald EN; Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):955-65. PubMed ID: 21361452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. English vowel identification and vowel formant discrimination by native Mandarin Chinese- and native English-speaking listeners: The effect of vowel duration dependence.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():58-65. PubMed ID: 26768853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparison of Persian Vowel Production in Hearing-Impaired Children Using a Cochlear Implant and Normal-Hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Drinnan M; Mohamadi R; Yadegari F; Nourbakhsh M; Torabinezhad F
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 25990321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intact Correction for Self-Produced Vowel Formant Variability in Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia Regardless of Auditory Feedback Availability.
    Parrell B; Ivry RB; Nagarajan SS; Houde JF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jun; 64(6S):2234-2247. PubMed ID: 33900786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.