147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23927196)
1. Assessment of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of rodent mammary tumors using ultrasound backscatter coefficients.
Kemmerer JP; Ghoshal G; Karunakaran C; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1559-68. PubMed ID: 23927196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative ultrasound imaging for monitoring in situ high-intensity focused ultrasound exposure.
Ghoshal G; Kemmerer JP; Karunakaran C; Abuhabsah R; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Oelze ML
Ultrason Imaging; 2014 Oct; 36(4):239-55. PubMed ID: 24970857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative Ultrasound for Monitoring High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment In Vivo.
Ghoshal G; Kemmerer JP; Karunakaran C; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Sep; 63(9):1234-42. PubMed ID: 26780790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficient estimates of rodent-tumor-mimicking structures: comparison of results among clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Pawlicki AD; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):233-50. PubMed ID: 22518954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.
Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Ultrasound Comparison of MAT and 4T1 Mammary Tumors in Mice and Rats Across Multiple Imaging Systems.
Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Rosado-Mendez IM; Nam K; Park Y; Pawlicki AD; Miller RJ; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Oelze ML; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Aug; 34(8):1373-83. PubMed ID: 26206823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.
Wirtzfeld LA; Nam K; Labyed Y; Ghoshal G; Haak A; Sen-Gupta E; He Z; Hirtz NR; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze M; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1386-400. PubMed ID: 25004506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The measurement of ultrasound backscattering from cell pellet biophantoms and tumors ex vivo.
Han A; Abuhabsah R; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; O'Brien WD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):686-93. PubMed ID: 23862841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in backscatter of liver tissue due to thermal coagulation induced by focused ultrasound.
Shishitani T; Matsuzawa R; Yoshizawa S; Umemura S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1724-30. PubMed ID: 23927213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-frequency ultrasound m-mode imaging for identifying lesion and bubble activity during high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation.
Kumon RE; Gudur MS; Zhou Y; Deng CX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):626-41. PubMed ID: 22341055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determining temperature distribution in tissue in the focal plane of the high (>100 W/cm(2)) intensity focused ultrasound beam using phase shift of ultrasound echoes.
Karwat P; Kujawska T; Lewin PA; Secomski W; Gambin B; Litniewski J
Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():211-9. PubMed ID: 26498063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-imaging platform comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements of live rat tumors.
Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Hafez ZT; Nam K; Labyed Y; Anderson JJ; Herd MT; Haak A; He Z; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze ML; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1117-23. PubMed ID: 20587435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Method for estimating total attenuation from a spatial map of attenuation slope for quantitative ultrasound imaging.
Pawlicki AD; O'Brien WD
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 23493614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative Ultrasound and the Pancreas: Demonstration of Early Detection Capability.
Miller RJ; Han A; Erdman JW; Wallig MA; O'Brien WD
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2093-2102. PubMed ID: 30575064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of effective ablated volume following high intensity focused ultrasound.
Fite BZ; Wong A; Liu Y; Mahakian LM; Tam SM; Aina O; Hubbard NE; Borowsky A; Cardiff RD; Dumont E; Ferrara KW
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120037. PubMed ID: 25785992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A targeting method based on acoustic backscatter for treatment planning in tissue ablation using focused ultrasound.
Zheng X; Vaezy S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Jan; 57(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19605311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.
Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2007-16. PubMed ID: 26446820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Echo Decorrelation Imaging of Rabbit Liver and VX2 Tumor during In Vivo Ultrasound Ablation.
Fosnight TR; Hooi FM; Keil RD; Ross AP; Subramanian S; Akinyi TG; Killin JK; Barthe PG; Rudich SM; Ahmad SA; Rao MB; Mast TD
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):176-186. PubMed ID: 27712923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-intensity focused ultrasound in breast pathology: non-invasive treatment of benign and malignant lesions.
Cavallo Marincola B; Pediconi F; Anzidei M; Miglio E; Di Mare L; Telesca M; Mancini M; D'Amati G; Monti M; Catalano C; Napoli A
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2015 Mar; 12(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 25418428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound in combination with cisplatin using a Xenograft model of cervical cancer.
Lee YY; Cho YJ; Choi JJ; Choi CH; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS; Kim YS; Lee JW
Anticancer Res; 2012 Dec; 32(12):5285-9. PubMed ID: 23225428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
