138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2392720)
1. Ophthalmoscopy versus non-mydriatic fundus photography in the detection of diabetic retinopathy in black patients.
Mollentze WF; Stulting AA; Steyn AF
S Afr Med J; 1990 Sep; 78(5):248-50. PubMed ID: 2392720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-mydriatic fundus photography: a viable alternative to fundoscopy for identification of diabetic retinopathy in an Aboriginal population in rural Western Australia?
Diamond JP; McKinnon M; Barry C; Geary D; McAllister IL; House P; Constable IJ
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1998 May; 26(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 9630290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of non-mydriatic fundus camera for screening of diabetic retinopathy: A hospital based observational study in Pakistan.
Fahadullah M; Memon NA; Salim S; Ahsan S; Fahim MF; Mumtaz SN; Shaikh SA; Memon MS
J Pak Med Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):378-382. PubMed ID: 30890831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diabetic retinopathy as detected using ophthalmoscopy, a nonmydriatic camera and a standard fundus camera.
Klein R; Klein BE; Neider MW; Hubbard LD; Meuer SM; Brothers RJ
Ophthalmology; 1985 Apr; 92(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 4000642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photography.
Lee VS; Kingsley RM; Lee ET; Lu M; Russell D; Asal NR; Bradford RH; Wilkinson CP
Ophthalmology; 1993 Oct; 100(10):1504-12. PubMed ID: 8414411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a non-mydriatic retinal camera in rural Victoria.
Harper CA; Livingston PM; Wood C; Jin C; Lee SJ; Keeffe JE; McCarty CA; Taylor HR
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1998 May; 26(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 9630291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing diabetic retinopathy lesions in scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and colour fundus photography.
Nghiem AZ; Nderitu P; Lukic M; Khatun M; Largan R; Kortuem K; Balaskas K; Sim D
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1035-e1040. PubMed ID: 31286663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Possible new method to improve detection of diabetic retinopathy: Polaroid non-mydriatic retinal photography.
Ryder RE; Vora JP; Atiea JA; Owens DR; Hayes TM; Young S
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Nov; 291(6504):1256-7. PubMed ID: 3933619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 1-field, 2-fields, and 3-fields fundus photography for detection and grading of diabetic retinopathy.
Lee JC; Nguyen L; Hynan LS; Blomquist PH
J Diabetes Complications; 2019 Dec; 33(12):107441. PubMed ID: 31668742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the utility of nonmydriatic retinal photography in Egyptian adults.
Penman AD; Saaddine JB; Hegazy M; Sous ES; Ali MA; Brechner RJ; Herman WH; Engelgau MM; Klein R
Diabet Med; 1998 Sep; 15(9):783-7. PubMed ID: 9737809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of non-mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients: mobile retinal camera study.
Taylor R; Lovelock L; Tunbridge WM; Alberti KG; Brackenridge RG; Stephenson P; Young E
BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6763):1243-7. PubMed ID: 1703024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of direct ophthalmoscopy for detection of diabetic retinopathy using fundus photographs as a reference standard.
Ahsan S; Basit A; Ahmed KR; Ali L; Shaheen F; Ulhaque MS; Fawwad A
Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2014; 8(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 24907174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-mydriatic fundus photography as an alternative to indirect ophthalmoscopy for screening of diabetic retinopathy in community settings: a comparative pilot study in rural and tribal India.
Gajiwala UR; Pachchigar S; Patel D; Mistry I; Oza Y; Kundaria D; B R S
BMJ Open; 2022 Apr; 12(4):e058485. PubMed ID: 35396308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
Kinyoun JL; Martin DC; Fujimoto WY; Leonetti DL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 May; 33(6):1888-93. PubMed ID: 1582794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonmydriatic ultra-wide-field scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Optomap) versus two-field fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy.
Liegl R; Liegl K; Ceklic L; Haritoglou C; Kampik A; Ulbig MW; Kernt M; Neubauer AS
Ophthalmologica; 2014; 231(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 24247157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effectiveness of screening for diabetic retinopathy by digital imaging photography and technician ophthalmoscopy.
Scanlon PH; Malhotra R; Thomas G; Foy C; Kirkpatrick JN; Lewis-Barned N; Harney B; Aldington SJ
Diabet Med; 2003 Jun; 20(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 12786681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a multi-field fundus photographing system using a non-mydriatic camera for diabetic retinopathy.
Shiba T; Maruo K; Akahoshi T
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1999 Aug; 45(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10499879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retinopathy screening in type 2 diabetes: reliability of wide angle fundus photography.
de Sonnaville JJ; van der Feltz van der Sloot D; Ernst L; Wijkel D; Heine RJ
Diabet Med; 1996 May; 13(5):482-6. PubMed ID: 8737032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
