294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23927315)
1. A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081901. PubMed ID: 23927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic compression after breast conserving therapy: controlling pressure instead of force.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):023501. PubMed ID: 24506652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic compression--a need for mechanical standardization.
Branderhorst W; de Groot JE; Highnam R; Chan A; Böhm-Vélez M; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 25596915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards personalized compression in mammography: a comparison study between pressure- and force-standardization.
de Groot JE; Branderhorst W; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJM
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 25554008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ
BMC Womens Health; 2015; 15():26. PubMed ID: 25783657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical validation of a pressure-standardized compression mammography system.
den Boer D; Dam-Vervloet LAJ; Boomsma MF; de Boer E; van Dalen JA; Poot L
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():251-254. PubMed ID: 30017290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is Individualizing Breast Compression during Mammography useful? - Investigations of pain indications during mammography relating to compression force and surface area of the compressed breast.
Feder K; Grunert JH
Rofo; 2017 Jan; 189(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 28002858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of pressure-controlled mammography compression paddles with respect to force-controlled compression paddles in clinical practice.
Jeukens CRLPN; van Dijk T; Berben C; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MBI
Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2545-2552. PubMed ID: 30617472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction of discomfort during mammography utilizing a radiolucent cushioning pad.
Markle L; Roux S; Sayre JW
Breast J; 2004; 10(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 15239794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical standardisation of mammographic compression using Volpara software.
Serwan E; Matthews D; Davies J; Chau M
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):789-794. PubMed ID: 33419655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60 degrees.
Brnić Z; Hebrang A
Eur J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 40(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 11673002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Breast Compression Be Reduced in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis?
Agasthya GA; D'Orsi E; Kim YJ; Handa P; Ho CP; D'Orsi CJ; Sechopoulos I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):W322-W332. PubMed ID: 28929809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast compression in mammography: how much is enough?
Poulos A; McLean D; Rickard M; Heard R
Australas Radiol; 2003 Jun; 47(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 12780439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast compression across consecutive examinations among females participating in BreastScreen Norway.
Waade GG; Sebuødegård S; Hogg P; Hofvind S
Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20180209. PubMed ID: 29927636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Fusco R; Raiano N; Raiano C; Maio F; Vallone P; Mattace Raso M; Setola SV; Granata V; Rubulotta MR; Barretta ML; Petrosino T; Petrillo A
Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108912. PubMed ID: 32151787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography.
Balleyguier C; Cousin M; Dunant A; Attard M; Delaloge S; Arfi-Rouche J
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 103():137-142. PubMed ID: 30223227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compression force and radiation dose in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Waade GG; Sanderud A; Hofvind S
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():41-46. PubMed ID: 28189207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient dose in digital mammography.
Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
