These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23927327)

  • 1. Heel effect adaptive flat field correction of digital x-ray detectors.
    Yu Y; Wang J
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081913. PubMed ID: 23927327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gain Correction for an X-ray Imaging System With a Movable Flat Panel Detector and Intrinsic Localization Crosshair.
    Park YK; Sharp GC
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Apr; 15(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 25795048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical Note: modification of the standard gain correction algorithm to compensate for the number of used reference flat frames in detector performance studies.
    Konstantinidis AC; Olivo A; Speller RD
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6683-7. PubMed ID: 22149850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
    Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple, direct method for x-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT.
    Siewerdsen JH; Daly MJ; Bakhtiar B; Moseley DJ; Richard S; Keller H; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):187-97. PubMed ID: 16485425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective correction of the heel effect in hand radiographs.
    Behiels G; Maes F; Vandermeulen D; Suetens P
    Med Image Anal; 2002 Sep; 6(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 12270225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gain and offset calibration reduces variation in exposure-dependent SNR among systems with identical digital flat-panel detectors.
    Willis CE; Vinogradskiy YY; Lofton BK; White RA
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4422-9. PubMed ID: 21859043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction of ring artifacts in CBCT: detection and correction of pixel gain variations in flat panel detectors.
    Altunbas C; Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091913. PubMed ID: 25186400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of detector uniformity issues for Siemens Inspiration systems.
    Baldelli P; Keavey E; Manley M; Power G; Phelan N
    Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():262-268. PubMed ID: 31927263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effects of Changing the Source-to-image Receptor Distance Parameter of Scattered X-ray Correction after Exposure on Image Quality in Portable Chest Radiography].
    Ijichi T; Matsushima M; Koga E; Kawahara Y; Tani K; Mio M; Obata A; Masumoto T; Kato S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022 Jul; 78(7):711-718. PubMed ID: 35675976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A generic geometric calibration method for tomographic imaging systems with flat-panel detectors--a detailed implementation guide.
    Li X; Da Z; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3844-54. PubMed ID: 20831092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise power spectrum of the fixed pattern noise in digital radiography detectors.
    Kim DS; Kim E
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2765-2773. PubMed ID: 27277023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Influence of projection data correction on digital breast tomosynthesis imaging].
    Zhang XY; Zhang H; Bian ZY; Zeng D; He J; Tian XM; Ma JH; Huang J
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2017 Mar; 37(3):323-329. PubMed ID: 28377347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiac motion correction based on partial angle reconstructed images in x-ray CT.
    Kim S; Chang Y; Ra JB
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2560-71. PubMed ID: 25979048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of ray profile modeling on resolution recovery in clinical CT.
    Hofmann C; Knaup M; Kachelrieß M
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021907. PubMed ID: 24506628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
    Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empirical beam hardening correction (EBHC) for CT.
    Kyriakou Y; Meyer E; Prell D; Kachelriess M
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5179-87. PubMed ID: 21089751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A fast and pragmatic approach for scatter correction in flat-detector CT using elliptic modeling and iterative optimization.
    Meyer M; Kalender WA; Kyriakou Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(1):99-120. PubMed ID: 20009184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical performance and image optimization of megavoltage cone-beam CT.
    Morin O; Aubry JF; Aubin M; Chen J; Descovich M; Hashemi AB; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1421-32. PubMed ID: 19472649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.