BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23928815)

  • 1. Drs. S.J. "Jack" Burrow and William R. Proffit on the efficacy of self-ligating brackets.
    Burrow SJ; Proffit WR; Keim RG
    J Clin Orthod; 2013 Jul; 47(7):413-8. PubMed ID: 23928815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Friction: self-ligating brackets].
    Thermac G; Morgon L; Godeneche J
    Orthod Fr; 2008 Dec; 79(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 19061628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical tips for improving 2D lingual treatment.
    Ludwig B; Glasl B; Lisson JA; Kinzinger GS
    J Clin Orthod; 2010 Jun; 44(6):360-2. PubMed ID: 20929096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superelastic nickel titanium spring clips for the SPEED appliance.
    Hanson GH
    J Clin Orthod; 2002 Sep; 36(9):520-3. PubMed ID: 12374040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.
    Doshi UH; Bhad-Patil WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21195280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
    Tecco S; Marzo G; Di Bisceglie B; Crincoli V; Tetè S; Festa F
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Brackets and friction in orthodontics: experimental study].
    Ben Rejeb Jdir S; Tobji S; Turki W; Dallel I; Khedher N; Ben Amor A
    Orthod Fr; 2015 Sep; 86(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 26370596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets.
    Yanase Y; Ioi H; Uehara M; Hara A; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19885424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
    De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro frictional forces generated by three different ligation methods.
    Gandini P; Orsi L; Bertoncini C; Massironi S; Franchi L
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):917-21. PubMed ID: 18298218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photoelastic analysis of stress generated by wires when conventional and self-ligating brackets are used: a pilot study.
    Sobral GC; Vedovello Filho M; Degan VV; Santamaria M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):74-8. PubMed ID: 25715719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class II therapy with a combination of customized lingual appliances and the Forsus device.
    O'Keeffe C; O'Keeffe ME
    J Clin Orthod; 2013 Aug; 47(8):464-70. PubMed ID: 24121396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
    Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correction of horizontal and vertical discrepancies with a new interactive self-ligating bracket system: the Quick system.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 21491009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
    Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Static frictional force and surface roughness of nickel-titanium arch wires.
    Prososki RR; Bagby MD; Erickson LC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 1927985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrusion of palatally displaced maxillary lateral incisors using nickel titanium closed-coil springs.
    Chun YS; Kim M; Lee SH; Roh G
    J Clin Orthod; 2015 Apr; 49(4):270-2. PubMed ID: 26105068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term stability of Class II correction with the Twin Force Bite Corrector.
    Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Uribe F; Nanda R
    J Clin Orthod; 2010 Jun; 44(6):363-76. PubMed ID: 20929097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.