200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23929078)
21. Application of optical coherence tomography in glaucoma suspect eyes.
Pomorska M; Krzyżanowska-Berkowska P; Misiuk-Hojło M; Zając-Pytrus H; Grzybowski A
Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Jan; 95(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 21981362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study.
Leung CK; Cheung CY; Weinreb RN; Qiu Q; Liu S; Li H; Xu G; Fan N; Huang L; Pang CP; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1257-63, 1263.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19464061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Structure-function correlations in glaucoma using matrix and standard automated perimetry versus time-domain and spectral-domain OCT devices.
Pinto LM; Costa EF; Melo LA; Gross PB; Sato ET; Almeida AP; Maia A; Paranhos A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(5):3074-80. PubMed ID: 24722699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparing spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and standard automated perimetry to diagnose glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
Rao HL; Yadav RK; Addepalli UK; Begum VU; Senthil S; Choudhari NS; Garudadri CS
J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(5):e69-74. PubMed ID: 25144210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic Accuracy of Technologies for Glaucoma Case-Finding in a Community Setting.
Dabasia PL; Fidalgo BR; Edgar DF; Garway-Heath DF; Lawrenson JG
Ophthalmology; 2015 Dec; 122(12):2407-15. PubMed ID: 26411836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of psychophysical and structural injury in eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and normal standard automated perimetry.
Bagga H; Feuer WJ; Greenfield DS
Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Feb; 124(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 16476885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optical coherence tomography machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection: a preliminary study.
Burgansky-Eliash Z; Wollstein G; Chu T; Ramsey JD; Glymour C; Noecker RJ; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 46(11):4147-52. PubMed ID: 16249492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry.
Goldbaum MH; Sample PA; Chan K; Williams J; Lee TW; Blumenthal E; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Sejnowski T; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):162-9. PubMed ID: 11773027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of glaucoma-diagnostic ability between wide-field swept-source OCT retinal nerve fiber layer maps and spectral-domain OCT.
Lee WJ; Oh S; Kim YK; Jeoung JW; Park KH
Eye (Lond); 2018 Sep; 32(9):1483-1492. PubMed ID: 29789659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography versus spectral optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in the diagnosis of glaucoma.
Koh KM; Jin S; Hwang YH
Curr Eye Res; 2014 Jan; 39(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 24074220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of macular ganglion cell analysis compared to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for preperimetric glaucoma diagnosis.
Kaushik S; Kataria P; Jain V; Joshi G; Raj S; Pandav SS
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 66(4):511-516. PubMed ID: 29582810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Takada S; Hashimoto S; Arimura E; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis.
Chan K; Lee TW; Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Weinreb RN; Sejnowski TJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):963-74. PubMed ID: 12214886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ability of Stratus OCT to identify localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects in patients with normal standard automated perimetry results.
Kim TW; Park UC; Park KH; Kim DM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1635-41. PubMed ID: 17389494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Relationship between standard automated perimetry and retinal nerve fiber layer parameters obtained with optical coherence tomography.
Lopez-Peña MJ; Ferreras A; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pablo LE
J Glaucoma; 2011 Sep; 20(7):422-32. PubMed ID: 21278593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Perimetric measurements with flicker-defined form stimulation in comparison with conventional perimetry and retinal nerve fiber measurements.
Horn FK; Tornow RP; Jünemann AG; Laemmer R; Kremers J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(4):2317-23. PubMed ID: 24355823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry.
Kara-José AC; Melo LAS; Esporcatte BLB; Endo ATNH; Leite MT; Tavares IM
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181428. PubMed ID: 28727836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic Ability of Swept-Source and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography for Glaucoma.
Lee SY; Bae HW; Seong GJ; Kim CY
Yonsei Med J; 2018 Sep; 59(7):887-896. PubMed ID: 30091323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic Accuracy of Spectralis SD OCT Automated Macular Layers Segmentation to Discriminate Normal from Early Glaucomatous Eyes.
Pazos M; Dyrda AA; Biarnés M; Gómez A; Martín C; Mora C; Fatti G; Antón A
Ophthalmology; 2017 Aug; 124(8):1218-1228. PubMed ID: 28461015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma.
Budenz DL; Michael A; Chang RT; McSoley J; Katz J
Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 15629813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
