1562 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23929370)
1. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments.
Eliasson A; Ortorp A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e30-8. PubMed ID: 21453396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
Lin WS; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Abdel-Azim T; Morton D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 25615919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Compagnoni MA; Molo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of implant impressions without impression copings: a three-dimensional analysis.
Kwon JH; Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 21640237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Different implant impression techniques for edentulous patients treated with CAD/CAM complete-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled trial reporting data at 3 year post-loading.
Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Mangani F; Barlattani A
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 24570979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
Conrad HJ; Pesun IJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
