251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23929404)
1. Validation of a Medicare Claims-based Algorithm for Identifying Breast Cancers Detected at Screening Mammography.
Fenton JJ; Onega T; Zhu W; Balch S; Smith-Bindman R; Henderson L; Sprague BL; Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA
Med Care; 2016 Mar; 54(3):e15-22. PubMed ID: 23929404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distinguishing screening from diagnostic mammograms using Medicare claims data.
Fenton JJ; Zhu W; Balch S; Smith-Bindman R; Fishman P; Hubbard RA
Med Care; 2014 Jul; 52(7):e44-51. PubMed ID: 22922433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of abnormal screening mammogram interpretation using Medicare claims data.
Hubbard RA; Zhu W; Balch S; Onega T; Fenton JJ
Health Serv Res; 2015 Feb; 50(1):290-304. PubMed ID: 24976519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer.
Nattinger AB; Laud PW; Bajorunaite R; Sparapani RA; Freeman JL
Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 39(6 Pt 1):1733-49. PubMed ID: 15533184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. External validation of Medicare claims codes for digital mammography and computer-aided detection.
Fenton JJ; Zhu W; Balch S; Smith-Bindman R; Lindfors KK; Hubbard RA
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1344-7. PubMed ID: 22695737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of claims-based stroke algorithms in contemporary Medicare data: reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke (REGARDS) study linked with medicare claims.
Kumamaru H; Judd SE; Curtis JR; Ramachandran R; Hardy NC; Rhodes JD; Safford MM; Kissela BM; Howard G; Jalbert JJ; Brott TG; Setoguchi S
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2014 Jul; 7(4):611-9. PubMed ID: 24963021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using Medicare data to estimate the prevalence of breast cancer screening in older women: comparison of different methods to identify screening mammograms.
Randolph WM; Mahnken JD; Goodwin JS; Freeman JL
Health Serv Res; 2002 Dec; 37(6):1643-57. PubMed ID: 12546290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older?
Smith-Bindman R; Quale C; Chu PW; Rosenberg R; Kerlikowske K
Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 16641665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ability of Medicare claims data to identify nursing home patients: a validation study.
Koroukian SM; Xu F; Murray P
Med Care; 2008 Nov; 46(11):1184-7. PubMed ID: 18953230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing health care use and cost consequences of a new screening modality: the case of digital mammography.
Henderson LM; Hubbard RA; Onega TL; Zhu W; Buist DS; Fishman P; Tosteson AN
Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1045-52. PubMed ID: 22922432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of digital mammography uptake on downstream breast-related care among older women.
Hubbard RA; Zhu W; Onega TL; Fishman P; Henderson LM; Tosteson AN; Buist DS
Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1053-9. PubMed ID: 23132199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limited validity of diagnosis codes in Medicare claims for identifying cancer metastases and inferring stage.
Chawla N; Yabroff KR; Mariotto A; McNeel TS; Schrag D; Warren JL
Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):666-72, 672.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25066409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of Medicare Claim-based Algorithm to Detect Breast, Prostate, or Lung Cancer Bone Metastases.
Sathiakumar N; Delzell E; Yun H; Jooste R; Godby K; Falkson C; Yong M; Kilgore ML
Med Care; 2017 Dec; 55(12):e144-e149. PubMed ID: 29135778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Leveraging Linkage of Cohort Studies With Administrative Claims Data to Identify Individuals With Cancer.
Bronson MR; Kapadia NS; Austin AM; Wang Q; Feskanich D; Bynum JPW; Grodstein F; Tosteson ANA
Med Care; 2018 Dec; 56(12):e83-e89. PubMed ID: 29334524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees.
Fenton JJ; Xing G; Elmore JG; Bang H; Chen SL; Lindfors KK; Baldwin LM
Ann Intern Med; 2013 Apr; 158(8):580-7. PubMed ID: 23588746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
Sprague BL; Arao RF; Miglioretti DL; Henderson LM; Buist DS; Onega T; Rauscher GH; Lee JM; Tosteson AN; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD;
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 28244803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multilevel factors associated with long-term adherence to screening mammography in older women in the U.S.
Hubbard RA; O'Meara ES; Henderson LM; Hill D; Braithwaite D; Haas JS; Lee CI; Sprague BL; Alford-Teaster J; Tosteson ANA; Wernli KJ; Onega T
Prev Med; 2016 Aug; 89():169-177. PubMed ID: 27261409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
