256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23929404)
21. Classification accuracy of claims-based methods for identifying providers failing to meet performance targets.
Hubbard RA; Benjamin-Johnson R; Onega T; Smith-Bindman R; Zhu W; Fenton JJ
Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 25302935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of three algorithms to identify incident breast cancer in Medicare claims data.
Gold HT; Do HT
Health Serv Res; 2007 Oct; 42(5):2056-69. PubMed ID: 17850533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Screening outcomes in older US women undergoing multiple mammograms in community practice: does interval, age, or comorbidity score affect tumor characteristics or false positive rates?
Braithwaite D; Zhu W; Hubbard RA; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Geller B; Dittus K; Moore D; Wernli KJ; Mandelblatt J; Kerlikowske K;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Mar; 105(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 23385442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Facility Mammography Volume in Relation to Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes.
Onega T; Goldman LE; Walker RL; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Taplin S; Geller BM; Hill DA; Smith-Bindman R
J Med Screen; 2016 Mar; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 26265482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of claims, medical records, and self-report for measuring fecal occult blood testing among medicare enrollees in fee for service.
Schenck AP; Klabunde CN; Warren JL; Peacock S; Davis WW; Hawley ST; Pignone M; Ransohoff DF
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Apr; 17(4):799-804. PubMed ID: 18381471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
Yankaskas BC; Haneuse S; Kapp JM; Kerlikowske K; Geller B; Buist DS;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):692-701. PubMed ID: 20439838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Design and Validation of a New Algorithm to Identify Incident Fractures in Administrative Claims Data.
Wright NC; Daigle SG; Melton ME; Delzell ES; Balasubramanian A; Curtis JR
J Bone Miner Res; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1798-1807. PubMed ID: 31170317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The sensitivity of Medicare billing claims data for monitoring mammography use by elderly women.
Mouchawar J; Byers T; Warren M; Schluter WW
Med Care Res Rev; 2004 Mar; 61(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 15035859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Implementation of an algorithm for the identification of breast cancer deaths in German health insurance claims data: a validation study based on a record linkage with administrative mortality data.
Langner I; Ohlmeier C; Haug U; Hense HW; Czwikla J; Zeeb H
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e026834. PubMed ID: 31350240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.
Ernster VL; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Zheng Y; Weaver DL; Cutter G; Yankaskas BC; Rosenberg R; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Taplin SH; Urban N; Geller BM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(20):1546-54. PubMed ID: 12381707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer.
Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Leutner C; Schild HH; Schrading S
Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 28221097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Socio- and Clinical Characteristics in Relation to Mammography Screening Compliance.
Lai SM; Meng C
J Registry Manag; 2018; 45(1):136-142. PubMed ID: 31017883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Malpractice claims following screening mammography in The Netherlands.
van Breest Smallenburg V; Setz-Pels W; Groenewoud JH; Voogd AC; Jansen FH; Louwman MW; Tielbeek AV; Duijm LE
Int J Cancer; 2012 Sep; 131(6):1360-6. PubMed ID: 22173962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patient Cost-Sharing and Utilization of Breast Cancer Diagnostic Imaging by Patients Undergoing Subsequent Testing After a Screening Mammogram.
Hughes DR; Espinoza W; Fein S; Rula EY; McGinty G
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e234893. PubMed ID: 36972047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Colorectal Cancer Identification Methods Among Kansas Medicare Beneficiaries, 2008-2010.
Lai SM; Jungk J; Garimella S
Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Jul; 12():E107. PubMed ID: 26160293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival among older women.
McCarthy EP; Burns RB; Freund KM; Ash AS; Shwartz M; Marwill SL; Moskowitz MA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 Oct; 48(10):1226-33. PubMed ID: 11037009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.
Buist DS; Anderson ML; Haneuse SJ; Sickles EA; Smith RA; Carney PA; Taplin SH; Rosenberg RD; Geller BM; Onega TL; Monsees BS; Bassett LW; Yankaskas BC; Elmore JG; Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL
Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 21343539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
