These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2392973)

  • 1. Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): the effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12-hr work shift environment.
    Reynolds JL; Royster LH; Pearson RG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Aug; 51(8):437-46. PubMed ID: 2392973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.
    Prince MM; Colligan MJ; Stephenson CM; Bischoff BJ
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 14992850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
    Neitzel R; Seixas N
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
    Savell JF; Toothman EH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of hearing protective devices.
    Gosztonyi RE
    J Occup Med; 1975 Sep; 17(9):569-80. PubMed ID: 1165499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the effectiveness of three hearing protection devices at an industrial facility with a TWA of 107 dB.
    Royster LH; Royster JD; Cecich TF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Aug; 76(2):485-97. PubMed ID: 6480999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual fit-testing of earplugs: a review of uses.
    Schulz TY
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):152-62. PubMed ID: 21368441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using audiometric data base analysis.
    Royster JD; Royster LH
    J Occup Med; 1986 Oct; 28(10):1055-68. PubMed ID: 3772540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation by industrial workers of passive and level-dependent hearing protection devices.
    Tufts JB; Hamilton MA; Ucci AJ; Rubas J
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(50):26-36. PubMed ID: 21173484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of the effectiveness of two different insert types of ear protection in preventing TTS in an industrial environment.
    Royster LH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Mar; 41(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 7395724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noise exposures aboard catcher/processor fishing vessels.
    Neitzel RL; Berna BE; Seixas NS
    Am J Ind Med; 2006 Aug; 49(8):624-33. PubMed ID: 16732555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
    Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
    Alberti PW; Riko K
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice.
    Alberti PW; Riko K; Abel SM; Kristensen R
    J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 513182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occupational hearing conservation.
    Osguthorpe JD; Klein AJ
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1991 Apr; 24(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 1857619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of shift work on noise-induced hearing loss.
    Chou YF; Lai JS; Kuo HW
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(45):185-8. PubMed ID: 19805926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods of measuring and rating hearing protector performance.
    Lotito F
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Oct; 37(10):590-5. PubMed ID: 983949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.