These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23929914)

  • 1. Consent for the use of human biological samples for biomedical research: a mixed methods study exploring the UK public's preferences.
    Lewis C; Clotworthy M; Hilton S; Magee C; Robertson MJ; Stubbins LJ; Corfield J
    BMJ Open; 2013 Aug; 3(8):. PubMed ID: 23929914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public views on the donation and use of human biological samples in biomedical research: a mixed methods study.
    Lewis C; Clotworthy M; Hilton S; Magee C; Robertson MJ; Stubbins LJ; Corfield J
    BMJ Open; 2013 Aug; 3(8):. PubMed ID: 23929915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.
    Porteri C; Pasqualetti P; Togni E; Parker M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Nov; 15():81. PubMed ID: 25425352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient Perspectives About Decisions to Share Medical Data and Biospecimens for Research.
    Kim J; Kim H; Bell E; Bath T; Paul P; Pham A; Jiang X; Zheng K; Ohno-Machado L
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e199550. PubMed ID: 31433479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking.
    Bryant J; Sanson-Fisher R; Fradgley E; Regan T; Hobden B; Ackland SP
    BMC Cancer; 2015 May; 15():413. PubMed ID: 25981796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Randomised Controlled Trial of Consent Procedures for the Use of Residual Tissues for Medical Research: Preferences of and Implications for Patients, Research and Clinical Practice.
    Rebers S; Vermeulen E; Brandenburg AP; Stoof TJ; Zupan-Kajcovski B; Bos WJ; Jonker MJ; Bax CJ; van Driel WJ; Verwaal VJ; van den Brekel MW; Grutters JC; Tupker RA; Plusjé L; de Bree R; Schagen van Leeuwen JH; Vermeulen EG; de Leeuw RA; Brohet RM; Aaronson NK; Van Leeuwen FE; Schmidt MK
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152509. PubMed ID: 27028128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patients' experiences and preferences for opt-in models and health professional involvement in biobanking consent: A cross-sectional survey of Australian cancer outpatients.
    Fradgley EA; Chong SE; Cox ME; Gedye C; Paul CL
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 29573159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attitudes of the Public Toward Consent for Biobank Research in Japan.
    Oikawa M; Takimoto Y; Akabayashi A
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2023 Oct; 21(5):518-526. PubMed ID: 36576410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Opt-in or opt-out health-care communication? A cross-sectional study.
    Tong V; Krass I; Robson S; Aslani P
    Health Expect; 2021 Jun; 24(3):776-789. PubMed ID: 33761176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public attitudes towards opt-out testing for HIV in primary care: a qualitative study.
    Glew S; Pollard A; Hughes L; Llewellyn C
    Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Feb; 64(619):e60-6. PubMed ID: 24567618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sharing, reuse, and storage of biosamples among biomedical researchers in Jordan: Practice and concerns.
    Alkaraki AK; Khabour OF; Alzoubi KH; Al-Ebbini LMK; Altaany Z
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267552. PubMed ID: 35482729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials.
    Robinson EJ; Kerr CE; Stevens AJ; Lilford RJ; Braunholtz DA; Edwards SJ; Beck SR; Rowley MG
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(8):1-192, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15763039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opt-out plus, the patients' choice: preferences of cancer patients concerning information and consent regimen for future research with biological samples archived in the context of treatment.
    Vermeulen E; Schmidt MK; Aaronson NK; Kuenen M; van der Valk P; Sietses C; van den Tol P; van Leeuwen FE
    J Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 19017681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in Biobanking.
    Joly Y; Dalpé G; So D; Birko S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0129893. PubMed ID: 26154134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples.
    Vermeulen E; Schmidt MK; Aaronson NK; Kuenen M; Baas-Vrancken Peeters MJ; van der Poel H; Horenblas S; Boot H; Verwaal VJ; Cats A; van Leeuwen FE
    Br J Cancer; 2009 Nov; 101(9):1505-12. PubMed ID: 19861997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Secondary use of health care data and left-over biosamples within the 'Medical Informatics Initiative' (MII): a quasi-randomized controlled evaluation of patient perceptions and preferences regarding the consent process.
    Roschka S; Leddig T; Bullerjahn M; Richter G; Liedtke W; Langanke M; Hoffmann W
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Jul; 22(1):184. PubMed ID: 35840947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient acceptance of rapid HIV testing practices in an urban emergency department: assessment of the 2006 CDC recommendations for HIV screening in health care settings.
    Haukoos JS; Hopkins E; Byyny RL;
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Mar; 51(3):303-9, 309.e1. PubMed ID: 18191295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19.
    Geldsetzer P
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Apr; 22(4):e18790. PubMed ID: 32240094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Racial differences in patient consent policy preferences for electronic health information exchange.
    Turvey CL; Klein DM; Nazi KM; Haidary ST; Bouhaddou O; Hsing N; Donahue M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 May; 27(5):717-725. PubMed ID: 32150259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Provision of information about newborn screening antenatally: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods project.
    Ulph F; Wright S; Dharni N; Payne K; Bennett R; Roberts S; Walshe K; Lavender T
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Oct; 21(55):1-240. PubMed ID: 28967862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.