These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. The effect of sodium hypochlorite application on the success of calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomies in primary teeth. Akcay M; Sari S Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 25197997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars. Noorollahian H Br Dent J; 2008 Jun; 204(11):E20. PubMed ID: 18425074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report. Eidelman E; Holan G; Fuks AB Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11242724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of four dressing materials in pulpotomized primary molars: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Fernández CC; Martínez SS; Jimeno FG; Lorente Rodríguez AI; Mercadé M Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Nov; 23(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 23171351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow-up study. Ibricevic H; Al-Jame Q Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Mar; 4(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 12870985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies in primary molars with formocresol, glutaraldehyde and ferric sulphate. Havale R; Anegundi RT; Indushekar K; Sudha P Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23474578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A histopathological comparison of pulpal response to formocresol and sodium hypochlorite used as pulpotomy medicaments: In primary teeth - A clinical trialA histopathological comparison of pulpal response to formocresol and sodium hypochlorite used as pulpotomy medicaments: In primary teeth - A clinical trial. Kola SR; Reddy NV; Sneha T; Reddy MA; Niharika P; Kumar PJ J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 31249186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children. Dean JA; Mack RB; Fulkerson BT; Sanders BJ Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 May; 12(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 12028309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Light-cured calcium hydroxide vs formocresol in human primary molar pulpotomies: a randomized controlled trial. Zurn D; Seale NS Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 18402097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy of primary teeth: a 2-year follow-up. Ansari G; Ranjpour M Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 20518934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of formocresol/ZOE sub-base pulpotomies utilizing alternative radiographic success criteria. Strange DM; Seale NS; Nunn ME; Strange M Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 11572492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate as pulpotomy agents in deciduous teeth. Srinivasan D; Jayanthi M Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 22048576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up. Sonmez D; Sari S; Cetinbaş T J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 18634926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]