These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23930785)

  • 1. Accuracy loss due to selection bias in cohort studies with left truncation.
    Schisterman EF; Cole SR; Ye A; Platt RW
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 27(5):491-502. PubMed ID: 23930785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Left truncation results in substantial bias of the relation between time-dependent exposures and adverse events.
    Hazelbag CM; Klungel OH; van Staa TP; de Boer A; Groenwold RH
    Ann Epidemiol; 2015 Aug; 25(8):590-6. PubMed ID: 25935711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Left truncation, susceptibility, and bias in occupational cohort studies.
    Applebaum KM; Malloy EJ; Eisen EA
    Epidemiology; 2011 Jul; 22(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 21543985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Left truncation in linked data: A practical guide to understanding left truncation and applying it using SAS and R.
    Jin Y; Ton TGN; Incerti D; Hu S
    Pharm Stat; 2023 Jan; 22(1):194-204. PubMed ID: 35843723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conditions for bias from differential left truncation.
    Howards PP; Hertz-Picciotto I; Poole C
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 165(4):444-52. PubMed ID: 17150983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Left Truncation Bias to Explain the Protective Effect of Smoking on Preeclampsia: Potential, But How Plausible?
    Kinlaw AC; Buckley JP; Engel SM; Poole C; Brookhart MA; Keil AP
    Epidemiology; 2017 May; 28(3):428-434. PubMed ID: 28145985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection bias introduced by informative censoring in studies examining effects of vaccination in infancy.
    López-López JA; Sterne JAC; Higgins JPT
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 48(6):2001-2009. PubMed ID: 31071211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias due to left truncation and left censoring in longitudinal studies of developmental and disease processes.
    Cain KC; Harlow SD; Little RJ; Nan B; Yosef M; Taffe JR; Elliott MR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 May; 173(9):1078-84. PubMed ID: 21422059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence of a paradoxical relationship between endotoxin and lung cancer after accounting for left truncation in a study of Chinese female textile workers.
    Applebaum KM; Ray RM; Astrakianakis G; Gao DL; Thomas DB; Christiani DC; LaValley MP; Li W; Checkoway H; Eisen EA
    Occup Environ Med; 2013 Oct; 70(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 23759537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies.
    Howe CJ; Cole SR; Lau B; Napravnik S; Eron JJ
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 26484424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semiparametric likelihood inference for left-truncated and right-censored data.
    Huang CY; Ning J; Qin J
    Biostatistics; 2015 Oct; 16(4):785-98. PubMed ID: 25796430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of left truncation of exposure in environmental case-control studies: evidence from breast cancer risk associated with airborne dioxin.
    Zhai Y; Amadou A; Mercier C; Praud D; Faure E; Iwaz J; Severi G; Mancini FR; Coudon T; Fervers B; Roy P
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 37(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 34254231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Counterpoint: Keeping the Demons at Bay When Handling Time-Varying Exposures-Beyond Avoiding Immortal Person-Time.
    Edwards JK; Htoo PT; Stürmer T
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 188(6):1016-1022. PubMed ID: 31155642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for length-bias and selection effects in estimating the distribution of menstrual cycle length.
    Lum KJ; Sundaram R; Louis TA
    Biostatistics; 2015 Jan; 16(1):113-28. PubMed ID: 25027273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immortal time bias in critical care research: application of time-varying Cox regression for observational cohort studies.
    Shintani AK; Girard TD; Eden SK; Arbogast PG; Moons KG; Ely EW
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Nov; 37(11):2939-45. PubMed ID: 19770737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies.
    Nohr EA; Liew Z
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):407-416. PubMed ID: 29415329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies.
    Biele G; Gustavson K; Czajkowski NO; Nilsen RM; Reichborn-Kjennerud T; Magnus PM; Stoltenberg C; Aase H
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 34(10):927-938. PubMed ID: 31451995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias due to differential participation in case-control studies and review of available approaches for adjustment.
    Aigner A; Grittner U; Becher H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191327. PubMed ID: 29364926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of truncation and missing family links in population-based registers on familial risk estimates.
    Leu M; Czene K; Reilly M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 166(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 17878173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.