144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23930786)
1. Letter to the editor from Ahrens and Schisterman.
Ahrens K; Schisterman E
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 27(5):503. PubMed ID: 23930786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response to Ahrens and Schisterman.
Sudan M; Kheifets L; Arah OA; Olsen J
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 27(5):504. PubMed ID: 23930787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A time and place for causal inference methods in perinatal and paediatric epidemiology.
Ahrens KA; Schisterman EF
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2013 May; 27(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 23574413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal structural models, doubly robust estimation, and bias analysis in perinatal and paediatric epidemiology.
Arah OA; Sudan M; Olsen J; Kheifets L
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2013 May; 27(3):263-5. PubMed ID: 23574414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cell phone exposures and hearing loss in children in the Danish National Birth Cohort.
Sudan M; Kheifets L; Arah OA; Olsen J
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2013 May; 27(3):247-57. PubMed ID: 23574412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
Baan R; Grosse Y; Lauby-Secretan B; El Ghissassi F; Bouvard V; Benbrahim-Tallaa L; Guha N; Islami F; Galichet L; Straif K;
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Jul; 12(7):624-6. PubMed ID: 21845765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial comment.
Safarinejad MR
Urol J; 2013; 10(2):892-3; discussion 893. PubMed ID: 23801473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Interphone, IARC and radiofrequency fields: where to next?
Sim MR; Richardson DB
Occup Environ Med; 2011 Sep; 68(9):629-30. PubMed ID: 21835976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tinnitus and cell phones: the role of electromagnetic radiofrequency radiation.
Mortazavi SM; Mortazavi SA
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(2):248-9. PubMed ID: 26906400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comments on the article entitled "review of possible modulation-dependent biological effects of radiofrequency fields" by Juutilainen et al.
Balzano Q; Sheppard AR
Bioelectromagnetics; 2012 Dec; 33(8):710-1. PubMed ID: 22496073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The precautionary principle: radiofrequency exposures from mobile telephones and base stations.
Zinelis SA
Environ Health Perspect; 2010 Jan; 118(1):A16; author reply A16-7. PubMed ID: 20238454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ICNIRP statement on EMF-emitting new technologies.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)
Health Phys; 2008 Apr; 94(4):376-92. PubMed ID: 18332730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientists decry Canada's outdated Wi-Fi safety rules.
Webster PC
CMAJ; 2015 Jun; 187(9):639-640. PubMed ID: 25964390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Editorial.
Kaplan S; Davis D
J Chem Neuroanat; 2016 Sep; 75(Pt B):41-2. PubMed ID: 27474471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Response to Comments on Meo et al. Association of Exposure to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Radiation (RF-EMFR) Generated by Mobile Phone Base Stations with Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2015, 12, 14519-14528.
Meo SA; Alsubaie Y; Almubarak Z; Almutawa H; AlQasem Y; Hasanato RM
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Feb; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 26927150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mobile telephones: playing with our health?].
Leal Hernández M; Abellán Alemán J; Casas Pina M
Aten Primaria; 2005 May; 35(8):415-8. PubMed ID: 15882498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans
IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum; 2013; 102(Pt 2):1-460. PubMed ID: 24772662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The controversy of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves].
Nau JY
Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Oct; 5(223):2177. PubMed ID: 19968033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Hypersensitivity to mobile phone emitted electromagnetic radiation].
Nau JY
Rev Med Suisse; 2012 Apr; 8(335):774-5. PubMed ID: 22545502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Electromagnetic pollution: another risk factor for infertility, or a red herring?
Lerchl A
Asian J Androl; 2013 Mar; 15(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 23001444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
