These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23932439)

  • 1. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update.
    Yossepowitch O; Briganti A; Eastham JA; Epstein J; Graefen M; Montironi R; Touijer K
    Eur Urol; 2014 Feb; 65(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 23932439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy].
    Galetti TP; Cattaneo F; Coati I; Gardiman M
    Urologia; 2014; 81(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 24803355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences.
    Yossepowitch O; Bjartell A; Eastham JA; Graefen M; Guillonneau BD; Karakiewicz PI; Montironi R; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jan; 55(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 18838211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients.
    Schlomm T; Tennstedt P; Huxhold C; Steuber T; Salomon G; Michl U; Heinzer H; Hansen J; Budäus L; Steurer S; Wittmer C; Minner S; Haese A; Sauter G; Graefen M; Huland H
    Eur Urol; 2012 Aug; 62(2):333-40. PubMed ID: 22591631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Diaz M; Peabody JO; Kapoor V; Sammon J; Rogers CG; Stricker H; Lane Z; Gupta N; Bhandari M; Menon M
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1168-1176. PubMed ID: 24996687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Novara G; Ficarra V; Mocellin S; Ahlering TE; Carroll PR; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Menon M; Patel VR; Shariat SF; Tewari AK; Van Poppel H; Zattoni F; Montorsi F; Mottrie A; Rosen RC; Wilson TG
    Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):382-404. PubMed ID: 22749851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
    Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
    BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
    Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
    BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.
    Sooriakumaran P; Srivastava A; Shariat SF; Stricker PD; Ahlering T; Eden CG; Wiklund PN; Sanchez-Salas R; Mottrie A; Lee D; Neal DE; Ghavamian R; Nyirady P; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Xylinas E; Loidl W; Seitz C; Schramek P; Roehrborn C; Cathelineau X; Skarecky D; Shaw G; Warren A; Delprado WJ; Haynes AM; Steyerberg E; Roobol MJ; Tewari AK
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 24290695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
    Kamat AM; Babaian K; Cheung MR; Naya Y; Huang SH; Kuban D; Babaian RJ
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1860-3. PubMed ID: 14532793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraoperative Frozen Section for Margin Evaluation During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.
    Dinneen EP; Van Der Slot M; Adasonla K; Tan J; Grierson J; Haider A; Freeman A; Oakley N; Shaw G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Jul; 6(4):664-673. PubMed ID: 31787570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
    De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer control and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
    Chade DC; Eastham J; Graefen M; Hu JC; Karnes RJ; Klotz L; Montorsi F; van Poppel H; Scardino PT; Shariat SF
    Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):961-71. PubMed ID: 22280856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.
    Pellegrino F; Falagario UG; Knipper S; Martini A; Akre O; Egevad L; Aly M; Moschovas MC; Bravi CA; Tran J; Heiniger Y; von Kempis A; Schaffar R; Carrieri G; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Rochat CH; Mottrie A; Ahlering TE; John H; Patel V; Graefen M; Wiklund P;
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Aug; 7(4):888-896. PubMed ID: 38155061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Population Based Cohort.
    Pearce SM; Pariser JJ; Karrison T; Patel SG; Eggener SE
    J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 26860793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients.
    Mauermann J; Fradet V; Lacombe L; Dujardin T; Tiguert R; Tetu B; Fradet Y
    Eur Urol; 2013 Jul; 64(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22901983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.