216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23932541)
1. Randomized clinical study comparing piezosurgery and conventional rotatory surgery in mandibular cyst enucleation.
Pappalardo S; Guarnieri R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e80-5. PubMed ID: 23932541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery: relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain with histological evaluations.
Rullo R; Addabbo F; Papaccio G; D'Aquino R; Festa VM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 41(2):e33-8. PubMed ID: 22890087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower wisdom tooth removal.
Mantovani E; Arduino PG; Schierano G; Ferrero L; Gallesio G; Mozzati M; Russo A; Scully C; Carossa S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1890-7. PubMed ID: 25234524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Piezosurgery or conventional rotatory instruments for inferior third molar extractions?
Piersanti L; Dilorenzo M; Monaco G; Marchetti C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 72(9):1647-52. PubMed ID: 25109581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of piezosurgery and traditional saw in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
Spinelli G; Lazzeri D; Conti M; Agostini T; Mannelli G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1211-20. PubMed ID: 24742747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vertical splitting of the mandibular body as an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve lateralization.
Rodriguez JG; Eldibany RM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1060-6. PubMed ID: 23769148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of platelet-rich fibrin and piezosurgery on impacted mandibular third molar surgery outcomes.
Uyanık LO; Bilginaylar K; Etikan İ
Head Face Med; 2015 Jul; 11():25. PubMed ID: 26209242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concomitant removal of mandibular third molars during sagittal split osteotomy minimizes neurosensory dysfunction.
Doucet JC; Morrison AD; Davis BR; Robertson CG; Goodday R; Precious DS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2153-63. PubMed ID: 22079060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MicroSaw and Piezosurgery in Harvesting Mandibular Bone Blocks from the Retromolar Region: A Randomized Split-Mouth Prospective Clinical Trial.
Hanser T; Doliveux R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):365-372. PubMed ID: 29534125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Piezosurgery for Sagittal Split Osteotomy: Procedure Duration and Postoperative Sensory Perturbation.
Köhnke R; Kolk A; Kluwe L; Ploder O
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 75(9):1941-1947. PubMed ID: 28595839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Piezosurgery versus conventional surgery in radicular cyst enucleation.
Kocyigit ID; Atil F; Alp YE; Tekin U; Tuz HH
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):1805-8. PubMed ID: 23147343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury in Trauma-Induced Mandible Fractures.
Tay AB; Lai JB; Lye KW; Wong WY; Nadkarni NV; Li W; Bautista D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1328-40. PubMed ID: 25914133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inferior alveolar nerve function after sagittal split osteotomy by reciprocating saw or piezosurgery instrument: prospective double-blinded study.
Monnazzi MS; Real Gabrielli MF; Passeri LA; Cabrini Gabrielli MA; Spin-Neto R; Pereira-Filho VA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1168-72. PubMed ID: 24480761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Piezoelectric ultrasonic bone surgery system in the extraction surgery of supernumerary teeth.
Gao Y; Lin Z; Rodella LF; Buffoli B; Wu X; Zhou Y
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1577-82. PubMed ID: 24942094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of clinical outcomes using a Piezosurgery device vs. a conventional osteotome for lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty.
Koc B; Koc EA; Erbek S
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Aug; 96(8):318-326. PubMed ID: 28846787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized clinical study comparing Piezoelectric Surgery with conventional rotatory osteotomy in mandibular third molars surgeries.
Al-Delayme RMA
Saudi Dent J; 2021 Jan; 33(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 33473237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of surgical outcome after removal of impacted mandibular third molars using a Piezotome or a conventional handpiece: a prospective study.
Goyal M; Marya K; Jhamb A; Chawla S; Sonoo PR; Singh V; Aggarwal A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 50(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 22088359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low to high oblique ramus piezoosteotomy: a pilot study.
Landes C; Tran A; Ballon A; Santo G; Schübel F; Sader R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):901-9. PubMed ID: 24503387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of piezoelectric surgery in reducing surgical complications after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
Shirota T; Kamatani T; Yamaguchi T; Ogura H; Maki K; Shintani S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 52(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24388635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Removal of impacted mandibular third molars using an inward fragmentation technique (IFT) - Method and first results.
Engelke W; Beltrán V; Cantín M; Choi EJ; Navarro P; Fuentes R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 23850159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
