138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23933776)
1. Critical illness research involving collection of genomic data: the conundrum posed by low levels of genomic literacy among surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients.
Iverson E; Celious A; Shehane E; Oerke M; Warren V; Eastman A; Kennedy CR; Freeman BD
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Jul; 8(3):53-7. PubMed ID: 23933776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surrogate consent for genomics research in intensive care.
Shelton AK; Fish AF; Cobb JP; Bachman JA; Jenkins RL; Battistich V; Freeman BD
Am J Crit Care; 2009 Sep; 18(5):418-26; quiz 427. PubMed ID: 19723862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic research and testing in critical care: surrogates' perspective.
Freeman BD; Kennedy CR; Coopersmith CM; Zehnbauer BA; Buchman TG
Crit Care Med; 2006 Apr; 34(4):986-94. PubMed ID: 16484903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surrogate and patient discrepancy regarding consent for critical care research.
Newman JT; Smart A; Reese TR; Williams A; Moss M
Crit Care Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2590-4. PubMed ID: 22732283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Key stakeholder perceptions about consent to participate in acute illness research: a rapid, systematic review to inform epi/pandemic research preparedness.
Gobat NH; Gal M; Francis NA; Hood K; Watkins A; Turner J; Moore R; Webb SA; Butler CC; Nichol A
Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():591. PubMed ID: 26715077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "A feeling that you're helping": proxy decision making for Alzheimer's research.
Dunn LB; Hoop JG; Misra S; Fisher SR; Roberts LW
Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2011; 1(2):107-22. PubMed ID: 24406656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surrogate Informed Consent: A Qualitative Analysis of Surrogate Decision Makers' Perspectives.
Lane T; Brereton E; Nowels C; McKeehan J; Moss M; Matlock DD
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2021 Jul; 18(7):1185-1190. PubMed ID: 33529538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Are individuals living with mental illness and their preferred alternative decision-makers attuned and aligned in their attitudes regarding treatment decisions?
Roberts LW; Kim JP
J Psychiatr Res; 2016 Jul; 78():42-7. PubMed ID: 27058644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical considerations in consenting critically ill patients for bedside clinical care and research.
Rincon F; Lee K
J Intensive Care Med; 2015 Mar; 30(3):141-50. PubMed ID: 24019298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research: findings of focus group participants.
Iverson E; Celious A; Kennedy CR; Shehane E; Eastman A; Warren V; Bolcic-Jankovic D; Clarridge B; Freeman BD
Chest; 2012 Dec; 142(6):1433-1439. PubMed ID: 22677349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association of Surrogate Decision-making Interventions for Critically Ill Adults With Patient, Family, and Resource Use Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Bibas L; Peretz-Larochelle M; Adhikari NK; Goldfarb MJ; Luk A; Englesakis M; Detsky ME; Lawler PR
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Jul; 2(7):e197229. PubMed ID: 31322688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surrogate consent for research involving adults with impaired decision making: survey of Institutional Review Board practices.
Gong MN; Winkel G; Rhodes R; Richardson LD; Silverstein JH
Crit Care Med; 2010 Nov; 38(11):2146-54. PubMed ID: 20802325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconceptualizing How to Support Surrogates Making Medical Decisions for Critically Ill Patients.
Dionne-Odom JN; White DB
JAMA; 2021 Jun; 325(21):2147-2148. PubMed ID: 33988689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Decisional conflict and regret: consequences of surrogate decision making for the chronically critically ill.
Hickman RL; Daly BJ; Lee E
Appl Nurs Res; 2012 Nov; 25(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 21658906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence of and Factors Related to Discordance About Prognosis Between Physicians and Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients.
White DB; Ernecoff N; Buddadhumaruk P; Hong S; Weissfeld L; Curtis JR; Luce JM; Lo B
JAMA; 2016 May; 315(19):2086-94. PubMed ID: 27187301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deferred proxy consent in emergency critical care research: ethically valid and practically feasible.
Jansen TC; Kompanje EJ; Bakker J
Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1 Suppl):S65-8. PubMed ID: 19104227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surrogate consent for dementia research: a national survey of older Americans.
Kim SY; Kim HM; Langa KM; Karlawish JH; Knopman DS; Appelbaum PS
Neurology; 2009 Jan; 72(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 19139366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dealer's Choice?: Choosing Among Surrogate Decision Makers with Different Decisions and Knowledge of the Patient.
Huber MT
Am J Bioeth; 2024 Jul; 24(7):129-131. PubMed ID: 38913456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Perspectives of surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients regarding gene variation research.
Iverson E; Celious A; Kennedy CR; Shehane E; Eastman A; Warren V; Freeman BD
Genet Med; 2013 May; 15(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 23154525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
