These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23933776)
1. Critical illness research involving collection of genomic data: the conundrum posed by low levels of genomic literacy among surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients. Iverson E; Celious A; Shehane E; Oerke M; Warren V; Eastman A; Kennedy CR; Freeman BD J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Jul; 8(3):53-7. PubMed ID: 23933776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study. Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM; Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surrogate consent for genomics research in intensive care. Shelton AK; Fish AF; Cobb JP; Bachman JA; Jenkins RL; Battistich V; Freeman BD Am J Crit Care; 2009 Sep; 18(5):418-26; quiz 427. PubMed ID: 19723862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic research and testing in critical care: surrogates' perspective. Freeman BD; Kennedy CR; Coopersmith CM; Zehnbauer BA; Buchman TG Crit Care Med; 2006 Apr; 34(4):986-94. PubMed ID: 16484903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surrogate and patient discrepancy regarding consent for critical care research. Newman JT; Smart A; Reese TR; Williams A; Moss M Crit Care Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2590-4. PubMed ID: 22732283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Barriers and Facilitators of Surrogates Providing Consent for Critically Ill Patients in Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Study. Krutsinger DC; Maloney SI; Courtright KR; Bartels K Chest; 2024 Aug; 166(2):304-310. PubMed ID: 38387647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Key stakeholder perceptions about consent to participate in acute illness research: a rapid, systematic review to inform epi/pandemic research preparedness. Gobat NH; Gal M; Francis NA; Hood K; Watkins A; Turner J; Moore R; Webb SA; Butler CC; Nichol A Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():591. PubMed ID: 26715077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "A feeling that you're helping": proxy decision making for Alzheimer's research. Dunn LB; Hoop JG; Misra S; Fisher SR; Roberts LW Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2011; 1(2):107-22. PubMed ID: 24406656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surrogate Informed Consent: A Qualitative Analysis of Surrogate Decision Makers' Perspectives. Lane T; Brereton E; Nowels C; McKeehan J; Moss M; Matlock DD Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2021 Jul; 18(7):1185-1190. PubMed ID: 33529538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Are individuals living with mental illness and their preferred alternative decision-makers attuned and aligned in their attitudes regarding treatment decisions? Roberts LW; Kim JP J Psychiatr Res; 2016 Jul; 78():42-7. PubMed ID: 27058644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical considerations in consenting critically ill patients for bedside clinical care and research. Rincon F; Lee K J Intensive Care Med; 2015 Mar; 30(3):141-50. PubMed ID: 24019298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association of Surrogate Decision-making Interventions for Critically Ill Adults With Patient, Family, and Resource Use Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Bibas L; Peretz-Larochelle M; Adhikari NK; Goldfarb MJ; Luk A; Englesakis M; Detsky ME; Lawler PR JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Jul; 2(7):e197229. PubMed ID: 31322688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surrogate consent for research involving adults with impaired decision making: survey of Institutional Review Board practices. Gong MN; Winkel G; Rhodes R; Richardson LD; Silverstein JH Crit Care Med; 2010 Nov; 38(11):2146-54. PubMed ID: 20802325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconceptualizing How to Support Surrogates Making Medical Decisions for Critically Ill Patients. Dionne-Odom JN; White DB JAMA; 2021 Jun; 325(21):2147-2148. PubMed ID: 33988689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Decisional conflict and regret: consequences of surrogate decision making for the chronically critically ill. Hickman RL; Daly BJ; Lee E Appl Nurs Res; 2012 Nov; 25(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 21658906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence of and Factors Related to Discordance About Prognosis Between Physicians and Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients. White DB; Ernecoff N; Buddadhumaruk P; Hong S; Weissfeld L; Curtis JR; Luce JM; Lo B JAMA; 2016 May; 315(19):2086-94. PubMed ID: 27187301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deferred proxy consent in emergency critical care research: ethically valid and practically feasible. Jansen TC; Kompanje EJ; Bakker J Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1 Suppl):S65-8. PubMed ID: 19104227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dealer's Choice?: Choosing Among Surrogate Decision Makers with Different Decisions and Knowledge of the Patient. Huber MT Am J Bioeth; 2024 Jul; 24(7):129-131. PubMed ID: 38913456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]